Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Open source and virtualization: a perfect match?

Virtualization could be Linux’s ticket to the data center
By John Fontana , Network World , 08/10/2007
  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print

Virtualization is a hot data center technology that is capturing the attention of IT for its consolidation and cost saving potential. As was evidenced at the LinuxWorld conference in San Francisco this week, open source and Linux platforms are on the forefront of the trend. In fact, given licensing issues with proprietary software, the combination of inexpensive or free open-source software and virtualization platforms may be the most important vehicle to drive widespread Linux adoption in the data center. Here are seven need-to-know points when looking at open source virtualization technology.

The Zen on Xen

Xen hypervisor is an open source virtualization engine developed by the founders of XenSource, which produces commercial virtualization software built off the Xen platform. Xen is delivered as an “engine” and developers can build components around it for their particular deployments, be they servers, clients, PDAs or embedded.

RONS (Red Hat, Oracle, Novell, Sun)

All these vendors offer virtualization technology based on the Xen hypervisor. The difference is that each has modified Xen in that open-source-kind-of-way to suit their specific needs and goals.

Kernel Based Virtual Machine (KVM)

KVM is the first virtualization technology to be part of the mainline Linux kernel (V2.6.20). It is designed for x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V). KVM includes a loadable kernel module and a processor-specific module, and runs both Windows and Linux virtual machines. Each virtual machine has private virtualized hardware, including a network card, disk, and graphics adapter. The first ever KVM conference is Aug. 29-31 in Tucson, Ariz.

KVM vs. Xen

KVM runs only on Linux, but on the upside it can take advantage of features such as memory management. Like Xen, KVM has the potential to scale (another inherited Linux trait). And like Xen, KVM’s power management, one so-called green feature, could use some help, and its memory support is weak. Xen has better management features and, obviously, runs on more platforms In addition, it supports paravirtualization, which in general is a technology that creates a proxy between the guest operating system and hardware.

What’s your type

A Type 1 hypervisor like Xen runs right on the hardware platform. A Type 2 hypervisor runs within an operating system, creating a stack that includes hardware, operating system hypervisor, and guest operating systems.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

SMART Steps Toward Consolidated Workload Automation

Consolidating job scheduling into a single, comprehensive workload automation solution is a critical first step to effective workload automation (WLA).

White paper on WLA here


A Comprehensive Approach to Practicing ITIL Change Management

Read a compelling whitepaper by EMA, Inc. to learn best practices for integrating workload automation.

Whitepaper here

2 Minutes to IT workload automation

BMC CONTROL-M can put money back into your IT budget and strip the complexity and risk from workload automation.

View video here

Gain a faster, cheaper way to manage workload

BMC CONTROL-M can help you migrate to a workload automation solution to meet your organization’s goals.

Listen here for more info

Comment
Login
Forgot your account info?
Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed