Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

Spouse-vs.-spouse cyberspying dangerous, possibly illegal

By Ellen Messmer , Network World , 08/16/2007
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Cindy Southworth

“These commercial surveillance packages, such as Spector from SpectorSoft, are turning up in domestic violence cases,” says Cindy Southworth, director of technology at the Washington, D.C.-based organization National Network to End Domestic Violence (NNEDV). The group gets many calls from women who say their abusers “know too much. We advise women, if you’re researching an escape plan or trying to find a new job, don’t do it on your home PC.”

Increasing use of stealthy surveillance software for computers and phones is raising legal concerns and alarm among those who help victims of domestic violence.

“These commercial surveillance packages, such as Spector from SpectorSoft, are turning up in domestic violence cases,” says Cindy Southworth, director of technology at the Washington, D.C.-based organization National Network to End Domestic Violence (NNEDV). The group gets many calls from women who say their abusers “know too much. We advise women, if you’re researching an escape plan or trying to find a new job, don’t do it on your home PC.”

Southworth advises those contacting NNEDV not to delete the surveillance software. Some antivirus packages, such as those from McAfee, F-Secure and Trend Micro, scan to detect stealth-surveillance programs and ask the user if they want to eradicate them.

“If the victim wants to get police involved, you don’t want the spyware eliminated,” says Southworth. In addition, the spyware can report every few minutes to the individual who installed and controls it, and the act of deleting or attempting to delete it has been known to trigger violence against the one being spied on.

One of the first criminal cases linking spyware and domestic abuse occurred six years ago and involved an estranged husband and wife in Belleview, Mich. The husband had secretly installed surveillance software from SpectorSoft to monitor her computer use. After the wife became suspicious she complained to local law enforcement.

The Michigan Attorney General’s high-tech unit came in to investigate, and after getting a search warrant for the husband’s computer they discovered reports of his wife’s computer activities stored there and identified SpectorSoft’s eBlaster as the spyware. SpectorSoft cooperated with Michigan law-enforcement in confirming the husband as the registered software purchaser.

“I remember that one, he got slapped on the wrist with a few years probation,” says SpectorSoft President Doug Fowler. The 8-year-old privately held Vero Beach, Fla., firm still “does occasionally get subpoenas from court jurisdictions asking us for information on did this person buy this software.”

But Fowler says SpectorSoft, which makes consumer and business versions of its surveillance software, three years ago stopped marketing its products as spouse-spying tools.

“It was a strain on our employees to support this environment that can get kind of nasty,” says Fowler, who notes the company has seen plenty of wives trying to spy on husbands, too. “Sometimes we get a wife who’s purchased the software and wants to monitor him at work. We tell them, this isn’t for monitoring computers you don’t own.”

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Comments (4)
Login
Forgot your account info?

RE: Spouse-vs.-spouse cyberspying dangerous, possibly illegalBy SUMj on August 16, 2007, 4:07 pmWehat do YOU think about spouse-versus-spouse cyberspying?

Reply | Read entire comment

I think it's unfortunateBy Anonymous on August 17, 2007, 12:14 pmI think it's unfortunate that we have come to this.

Reply | Read entire comment

Ckyberspying-Spouse-v-Spouse or Any one ElseBy Charles Ellis on August 17, 2007, 12:49 pmIn my humble opinion it is unlawful to monitor another persons communications without a Court Order, with no exceptions for business. The only exception that should...

Reply | Read entire comment

Read ThisBy Anonymous on August 17, 2007, 3:31 pmIf you read the August issue of details, you'll know why it's necessary. http://men.style.com/details/features/landing?id=content_5748

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed