ISO votes to reject Microsoft's OOXML as standard
By Peter Sayer
,
IDG News Service
, 09/04/2007
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
Microsoft has failed in its attempt to have its Office Open XML document format fast-tracked straight to the status of an international
standard by the International Organization for Standardization.
The proposal must be revised to take into account the negative comments made during the voting process.
Microsoft expects that a second vote early next year will result in approval, it said Tuesday.
A proposal must pass two voting hurdles to be approved as an ISO standard: It must win the support of two-thirds of voting
national standards bodies that participated in work on the proposal, known as P-members, and also of three-quarters of all
voting members.
OOXML failed on both counts, according to figures provided by Microsoft, and by other sources with knowledge of the voting
process. ISO has not yet officially announced the results.
Microsoft could miss out on revenue from the lucrative government market if OOXML is also rejected next year. Some governments,
worried that the need for access to electronic archives held in proprietary formats leaves them hostage to their software
vendor, have required the use of document formats that comply with open international standards.
Others are considering such a move, which could put Microsoft at a double disadvantage to open source products, such as OpenOffice.org,
which not only store files natively in the standardized Open Document Format, but are free.
The IDG News Service is a Network World affiliate.
Comments (9)
RE: ISO votes to reject Microsoft's OOXML as standardBy Felix Nkansah on September 4, 2007, 9:45 amI wish Microsoft's OOXML never gets the ISO 'signet ring'. I dont see how anything from the company called Microsoft could be called a standard. Its high...
Reply | Read entire comment
Microsoft -- Open StandardsBy Anonymous on September 4, 2007, 4:29 pmIt is time to get realistic. Agencies and businesses keep specifying documents to be delivered in Microsoft Word format no matter that is is a poor tool and limits...
Reply | Read entire comment
Oh, Brother, Not AgainBy Rick on September 4, 2007, 5:05 pmIt's really irksome to read something so blissfully ignorant as "I dont -sic- see how anything from the company called Microsoft could be called a standard." The...
Reply | Read entire comment
Your the ignorant one. WellBy Anonymous on September 8, 2007, 3:49 pmYour the ignorant one. Well educated, but deceived never the less! Micro$oft is not an innovator by any true sense of the word. They are more likened to the Borg....
Reply | Read entire comment
CompetitionBy Marc on September 11, 2007, 4:40 amAn absurd rant Rick not least because capitalism is based on competition, & supply & demand, not on de facto monopolies & nationalist power as you seem to think...
Reply | Read entire comment
Open Office and Star OfficeBy Anonymous on September 11, 2007, 9:39 amOpen Office and Star Office have NOT "risen from the realm of unwashed-hippie-cult-following fodder" but from a commercial product (made in Germany) that went from...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments