- The 10 dumbest mistakes network managers make
- Six Windows 7 features admins will actually care about
- Why the iPhone can't be "killed"
- Nortel enterprise chief wants to bring back Bay
- More porn sneaks onto the iPhone
Microsoft has failed in its attempt to have its Office Open XML document format fast-tracked straight to the status of an international standard by the International Organization for Standardization.
The proposal must be revised to take into account the negative comments made during the voting process.
Microsoft expects that a second vote early next year will result in approval, it said Tuesday.
A proposal must pass two voting hurdles to be approved as an ISO standard: It must win the support of two-thirds of voting national standards bodies that participated in work on the proposal, known as P-members, and also of three-quarters of all voting members.
OOXML failed on both counts, according to figures provided by Microsoft, and by other sources with knowledge of the voting process. ISO has not yet officially announced the results.
Microsoft could miss out on revenue from the lucrative government market if OOXML is also rejected next year. Some governments, worried that the need for access to electronic archives held in proprietary formats leaves them hostage to their software vendor, have required the use of document formats that comply with open international standards.
Others are considering such a move, which could put Microsoft at a double disadvantage to open source products, such as OpenOffice.org, which not only store files natively in the standardized Open Document Format, but are free.
Comments (9)
Not so much about duplicate standards but rather poor standardsBy Gavin Bollard on September 11, 2007, 5:22 pmWhile I'm appalled at the idea of having duplicate standards yet again, the real problem isn't about duplication but rather about the quality of the proposed standard. From...
Reply | Read entire comment
Who says ODF can't be read by Microsoft?By Anonymous on September 11, 2007, 12:42 pmAnonymous stated: "So who really believes that the US Government or any State is really going to say give me documents that can't be read by Microsoft software?...
Reply | Read entire comment
Innovator ?By Martin on September 11, 2007, 10:20 amMicrosoft has always been like Japanese car makers, not invented things, just damn good at copying from others. I think you forgto that Excel was the third spreadsheet...
Reply | Read entire comment
Open Office and Star OfficeBy Anonymous on September 11, 2007, 9:39 amOpen Office and Star Office have NOT "risen from the realm of unwashed-hippie-cult-following fodder" but from a commercial product (made in Germany) that went from...
Reply | Read entire comment
CompetitionBy Marc on September 11, 2007, 4:40 amAn absurd rant Rick not least because capitalism is based on competition, & supply & demand, not on de facto monopolies & nationalist power as you seem to think...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments