- How to make new stuff from your piles of obsolete tech
- Why your computer sucks
- 10 recession-proof IT skills
- Juniper execs share network vision
- 9-year-old plots his fifth Microsoft certification
European Union Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes has slammed comments from the U.S. Department of Justice about Monday's European court ruling on an antitrust judgment against Microsoft.
Kroes described the criticism of the ruling as "totally unacceptable" during a news conference in Brussels on Wednesday.
The DOJ's Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, Thomas Barnett, criticized the ruling sharply on Monday, warning that it could "have the unfortunate consequence of harming consumers by chilling innovation and discouraging competition."
Kroes fired back: "I think it's totally unacceptable [that a representative of the U.S. government] should criticize an independent court's decision. The Commission doesn't pass judgement on rulings in U.S. courts. We expect the same respect," she said.
On Monday the Court of First Instance, Europe's second-highest court, dismissed an appeal by Microsoft against the Commission's 2004 antitrust ruling against the company.
The DOJ statement added: "In the United States, antitrust laws are enforced to protect consumers by protecting competition, not competitors". Barring "demonstrable consumer harm, all companies, including dominant firms, are encouraged to compete vigorously."
Kroes, who plans to visit Washington D.C. in the coming weeks, said that if Microsoft is unhappy with the court ruling it should appeal it to Europe's top court, the Court of Justice.
Comments (3)
RE: EC's Kroes slams DOJ reaction to Microsoft rulingBy Mr. Clean on September 20, 2007, 11:28 amWhat planet does Thomas Barnett live on?!?!
Reply | Read entire comment
Compitition vs. Monopolistic powerBy dscott1644 on September 20, 2007, 12:01 pmI had applauded the EU court ruling which I feel will facilitate a more competitive market. From the articles I read, much of the ruling was based on WMP (Windows...
Reply | Read entire comment
correctionBy dscott1644 on September 20, 2007, 1:37 pmOOps I just noticed I use Kroes's name instead of Barnetts. Sorry, Kroes has his act together, Barnet...?
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments