- BlackBerry Storm vs. the iPhone
- Digg's Kevin Rose: "We have to do better"
- Blogger warns: "Nortel doesn't make it out alive"
- Financial quagmire bringing out the scammers
- Verizon plays with the wrong e-mail addresses
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:Application Performance Solutions | App Performance | Networking Solution | SafeGuard Enterprise Solution Center | SOA | Test your Web Filter | Value of WDS
Although Apple’s Steve Jobs has declared war on iPhone hackers, no one knows for certain how he plans to stop them.
The major reason that Apple wants to stop hackers from creating new open source programs for its iPhone, some analysts say, is that it has signed exclusivity agreements in various countries with service providers such as AT&T, T-Mobile and O2. Because Apple wants these companies to have incentives to continue developing exclusive applications for the iPhone, they say, Apple must make an effort to stop open source use.
“The open source applications are probably affecting AT&T more than they’re affecting Apple,” says Peiter “Mudge” Zatko, a division scientist at BBN Technologies. “I would imagine there’s an exclusivity clause somewhere in the contract with AT&T, at least for a particular period of time, primarily so people couldn’t go to other carriers.”
While Apple isn’t going to passively watch while others develop open-source programs for its devices, it isn’t clear how aggressively the company plans to go after hackers. Steve Jobs called the back-and-forth battle between Apple and hackers a “a cat-and-mouse game” where “people will try to break in, and it's our job to stop them breaking in,” but he didn’t give specific details on what the company planned to do.
Dan Steinberg, the president of the Quebec-based firm Synthesis: Law and Technology, says that the effort Apple puts into stopping hackers will correlate directly with how much open source applications hurt both its bottom line and the bottom lines of its partners.
“We don’t know if they’re going to pay lip service to this or if they’re going to go hardcore,” he says. “To know that, you’d have to know their business model, and you’d have to know the details of the deals they’ve made with various cell phone companies.”
One of the options open to Apple is to file lawsuits against hackers under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which was passed in 1998 to ban the use of any devices that can be used to circumvent digital rights management systems. The DMCA has been invoked in several high-profile cases, including YouTube's defense against a threatened Viacom suit for the copyrighted video clips that its users had posted online, and the Motion Picture Association of America's suit against 321 Studios for developing encryption-busting DVD copying software.
Comments (8)
Clarify Your TermsBy Anonymous on September 25, 2007, 2:11 pmThere are two different categories of "Hacks", and your article doesn't keep them separate. Category 1 is what is know as a SIM Hack. These hacks enable the iPhone...
Reply | Read entire comment
iPhoneBy Anonymous on September 25, 2007, 12:41 pmLet's look at the car model, there are people selling chips to replace the EPROM in the cars ECM to deliver more horsepower. This will most certainly void your warranty,...
Reply | Read entire comment
Consider SomethingBy Anonymous on September 24, 2007, 11:47 pmIn the MS Windows Mobile world, there are entire communities working on modified ROMs to fit various personalities and tastes. And while these ROMs may void warranties...
Reply | Read entire comment
greedBy Chris in Kansas on September 21, 2007, 10:50 pm"Because Apple wants these companies to have incentives to continue developing exclusive applications for the iPhone," Explain why Apple charges for ringtones then....
Reply | Read entire comment
I think the Poll associatedBy Anonymous on September 21, 2007, 2:53 pmI think the Poll associated with this article needs a rethink on the positions. I'm pretty sure the combination of 'its illegal and hurts everyone in the long run'...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments