Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Can muni Wi-Fi be saved?

By Thomas Wailgum , CIO , 10/02/2007
  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print

It's fair to say that most municipal Wi-Fi projects start out with the best intentions. Certainly there's nothing wrong with bridging the digital divide by offering wireless access to low-income residents who can't afford broadband. Or giving local emergency responders wireless freedom and connectivity so that they can have seamless communications with each other.

But, as evidenced just over the last month, "best intentions" technology projects like muni Wi-Fi often have trouble creating sustainable business models. The most recent news out of San Francisco, Houston and Chicago has not been good news for the municipal Wi-Fi movement. San Francisco's proposed wireless network, which has endured months of heated negotiations during the last year and was inching closer to rollout, was put on hold in late August when Internet service provider EarthLink, the builder of the citywide network, pulled the plug on the deal.

EarthLink had been contracted to build the citywide WLAN (wireless local area network) at no charge to San Francisco and then sell high-speed wireless access services to residents. According to EarthLink, the proposed arrangements for the wireless project, which had all the right players behind it (including Google), had become unworkable. For EarthLink, muni Wi-Fi was one way to try to offset growing revenue losses that it faced in its aging dial-up ISP business.

"We will not devote any new capital to the old muni Wi-Fi model that has us taking all of the risk by fronting all of the capital, then paying to buy our customers one by one," President and CEO Rolla Huff said on a conference call after EarthLink announced a disappointing financial forecast and 900 layoffs on August 29. The business model would have to change.

Reevaluating Wi-Fi in Chicago

Meanwhile, EarthLink's similar metro-size deals in Houston and Chicago look shaky too, due to the uneven financial burdens that both sides feel they areshouldering. Chicago CIO Hardik Bhatt said in an August 31 press release that the city was going to "reevaluate its approach" to its citywide wireless network.

"A municipal Wi-Fi network was initially envisioned as a way to provide cheaper, high-speed access to consumers. But, given the rapid pace of changing technology, in just two short years, the marketplace has altered significantly," Bhatt said. "When neither organization could justify a business case for the type of partnership outlined in our proposal, we realized - after much consideration - that we need to reevaluate our approach to provide universal and affordable access to high-speed Internet as part of the city's broader digital inclusion efforts."

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print
Comments (6)
Login
Forgot your account info?

MuniFiBy Anonymous on October 26, 2007, 4:45 pmmuni wi-fi = classic example of [url]http://static7.userland.com/oracle/gems/reynolds/HypeCycle.png[/url]

Reply | Read entire comment

Local television news reports Portland MetroFi network on holdBy Russell Senior on October 5, 2007, 3:11 amNot growing anymore. KGW.com ran a story this evening indicating that MetroFi had told the City that it was stopping the deployment of new SkyPilots pending the...

Reply | Read entire comment

Muni WiFiBy Inventor on October 4, 2007, 2:59 pmFolks: When the public channels were "Hatched", it had "Verhozenjob" all over it. Since the FCC is "OWNED" by Verhozen is the reason why the channels in the...

Reply | Read entire comment

Community Broadband Networks Can Work With the Right ApproachBy Bob Panoff on October 4, 2007, 10:17 amThis article a little too negative and that it might have dwelled more on approaches with potential to make “mnui Wi-Fi” more successful. Certainly, the hype pendulum...

Reply | Read entire comment

Cities need to exploreBy Anonymous on October 2, 2007, 9:22 pmCities need to explore WiMAX. Sprint/Clearwire will offer us XOHM. It won't be free, but it will cost less than cable and DSL.

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed
Get instant email notification when white papers, webcasts, executive guides are added to our library. Stay informed and up-to-date with the latest on IT Technologies with Network World's Resource Alerts.
Network World,to go. Wherever you are. Breaking news delivered to your mobile device. Select the hottest topics in networking and start receiving Network World on your mobile device today.