Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Telcos spar over service pricing

Critics say granting forbearance petitions would hurt competition
By Brad Reed , NetworkWorld.com , 10/02/2007

Representatives from both local and national telecom companies fought over the future of telecom service pricing during a House Energy Subcommittee hearing Tuesday.

The companies’ arguments stemmed from the FCC’s decision last year that lifted restrictions on what Verizon could charge its competitors for high-speed data services. Because many carriers rely upon infrastructure owned by telcos such as Verizon, AT&T and Qwest to provide last mile connections for their customers, many providers have expressed concern that companies owning last mile infrastructure could now have the power to price competition out of the market.

Tom Tauke, Verizon’s executive vice president for public affairs, argued during the hearings that the FCC should grant other companies’ forbearance petitions, thus giving them the power to price their high-speed broadband services whatever they choose. Currently, both Qwest and AT&T have filed forbearance petitions and are awaiting word from the FCC. Forbearance petitions typically let incumbent carriers obtain FCC waivers from rules requiring them to offer their “local loops” to smaller companies at competitive rates. Critics say the petitions deprive communities and businesses of access to affordable and innovative new broadband services.

“Similar freedoms granted to Verizon almost a year and a half ago have been a dramatic success story,” said Tauke, who noted that the lift on pricing restrictions had given Verizon “the flexibility to craft customized solutions to better meet the needs of our customers.” He also accused companies who opposed granting forbearance of “trying to use regulatory measures to undermine a successful market-based business environment.”

On the other side of the argument was Brad Evans, the chairman of Virginia-based Cavalier Telephone & TV. Evans said that Verizon’s desire for forbearance was part of a determination to “eliminate all competition by any means possible.” Specifically, he said that granting forbearance petitions to Verizon and other telcos would hurt other companies’ ability to provide last mile connectivity.

“The last mile of copper wires is essential to Cavalier’s ability to compete,” he said. “It has allowed us to provide new innovations by inventing startling new uses for copper facilities.”

Partner Content

Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure

Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.

Download the Free Info Kit

Next-Gen Load Balancing

Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.

Download the Free Guide

Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x

Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications." Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.

Download the Free Guide

Comments (1)
Login
Forgot your account info?

RE: Telcos spar over service pricingBy chris on October 3, 2007, 10:54 amThe balance swings towards the telcos. Telcos have to invest in the building of "last mile", maintenance, repair, distribution, and labor. The CLECs want Telcos...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed
Get instant email notification when white papers, webcasts, executive guides are added to our library. Stay informed and up-to-date with the latest on IT Technologies with Network World's Resource Alerts.