- Protecting yourself from a new online scam
- Diary of a deliberately spammed housewife
- Silly Internet traditions: A concise history
- How to avoid laptop loss at the airport
- Top 10 worst uses for Windows
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Cisco’s dominance in enterprise networking doesn’t necessarily mean it is the only game in town — or that you jeopardize job security by bypassing Cisco.
Indeed, the old adage goes, no one ever got fired for buying Cisco. But can someone get fired for staying with Cisco?
Two educational institutions are not waiting to find out. They are replacing Cisco switches with other vendors’ gear due to what they say is greater feature/functionality from competitive offerings, and lower prices.
Fayetteville State University (FSU) in Fayetteville, N.C., is replacing more than 50 of its 280 Cisco switches with ConSentry equipment because of the embedded network access control (NAC) capabilities of those switches. And a high school in Mountain View, Calif., is replacing 27 Cisco switches with HP ProCurve systems due to ProCurve’s lifetime warranty, equal or better functionality, lower price and wireless capabilities, a school official says.
A Cisco spokesman says the company can't comment on the MountainView project without the customer's permission. With regard to FSU, Cisco says the 50 or so switches being replaced include non-Cisco switches, but FSU counters that it was a "100% Cisco shop" before installing the ConSentry gear.
FSU’s decision to change out about 20% of its Cisco infrastructure came when the university encountered problems with Cisco’s Clean Access NAC appliance. The Cisco platform kept going down, students weren’t properly downloading the desktop agent, and the IT team had no visibility into what was happening on the network.
The Cisco solution depended on Cisco desktop software to provide that endpoint verification. Clean Access verifies whether users are running updated antivirus and antispyware software, but it doesn’t scan users’ computers for the actual presence of malware on that machine.
As a result, Trojans, denial-of-service attacks and other malware entered the FSU network and brought down the Clean Access platform. Also, bad traffic from users could hit the Clean Access server even if they had not authenticated or passed the EPV check, because that server was set up as the default gateway, according to FSU.
“We were having all kinds of problems,” said Joseph Vittorelli, director of systems and infrastructure at the school. “One of the biggest problems was the fact that students would come on in the evening after classes and start downloading music, movies, whatever. And then the viruses and infections they had would start hammering the NAC clients and it would just freeze up. It got to the point where we had to write scripts to reboot the thing every night so that people could get on in the morning.”
The Diane's of the industry should be acknowledged for their understanding of why products fail when...- Anon
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: “Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today’s Network Traffic” shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: “The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications.” Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (29)
I agree, switches are notBy Anonymous on November 8, 2007, 1:28 pmI agree, switches are not all the same. But careful on drinking too much of that Cisco kool-aide. It's often not as sugary as they say. Stay open to options and...
Reply | Read entire comment
Forget those crabs, Cisco isBy abbeyolu on November 1, 2007, 1:50 amForget those crabs, Cisco is by far more innovative than all these guys you are talking about. They have the best channels and support. I believe they are simply...
Reply | Read entire comment
HP deploying its own networking technologyBy Anonymous on October 13, 2007, 12:06 amIn response to "I have Cisco and HP", I would ask that you google "HP data center consolidation and ProCurve" to read the press releases regarding HP's use of its...
Reply | Read entire comment
New too pricey? Try pre-owned Cisco gearBy techguy123 on October 12, 2007, 5:03 pmTo read that your readers believe Cisco gear is overpriced is akin to hearing the sky is blue and the grass is green. The findings certainly prove the grass is greener...
Reply | Read entire comment
HP vs Cisco vs 3ComBy Anonymous on October 12, 2007, 4:15 pmWe are using HP networking product named HP AdvanceStack 18 years ago. after 5years, we can't get support due to End of Life. HP reseller just said "you have to...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments