- What does Cisco have against Quebec?
- Attrition.org nails another nitwit
- Diary of a deliberately spammed housewife
- Seven cloud-computing security risks
- 20 great Windows open source projects
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer says Red Hat Linux uses intellectual property owned by Microsoft and that Red Hat’s customers should pay Microsoft for it.
Ballmer made the claim, an echo of earlier remarks aimed at the open source community, during a presentation at a Microsoft event Oct. 4 in London.
"People who use Red Hat, at least with respect to our intellectual property, in a sense have an obligation eventually to compensate us," Ballmer stated, according to news reports, and a video of his remarks posted online.
Asked for comment, Red Hat reiterated its position that its customers are protected from liability by its Open Source Assurance Program, which includes “indemnification against claims raised by any holder of software patents,” according to information on Red Hat’s Web site.
Red Hat is also a founder of the Open Invention Network, which provides “a patent safe harbor for the Linux environment,” Red Hat states.
Ballmer’s remarks are “unfortunate,” said Jim Zemlin, executive director of the Linux Foundation. If Microsoft really believes Linux violates its patents, it should sue, but that by doing so, it’d be suing its own customers because many use both Microsoft and Linux in their IT systems.
“They have yet to actually make a specific allegation that an identified patent is infringed in a specific product. Until they do it, they'll just create more ill will in the development community and among their own customers, since by their own admission, most of them have both Microsoft and Linux running in their data centers,” Zemlin says.
He urged Microsoft to help to reform the software patent system if it supports interoperability with open source. Microsoft entered into an agreement with open source Linux vendor Novell in November 2006 to improve interoperability with Windows and Novell SUSE Linux and protect Novell customers from intellectual property liability claims.
A Gartner research report says Microsoft’s strategy is not to file suit but use the infringement claims as leverage to win other agreements like the one with Novell.
”We think the company will attempt to pressure technology providers to come to the table and negotiate an equitable licensing or royalty arrangement in instances where Microsoft can prove its claims of infringement,” Gartner stated in response to a May 14 Fortune magazine article in which Microsoft claimed open source software violated 235 of its patents.
and there is always a but... firebug doesnt work :(- Anonymous
Partner Content
CA Network & Voice Resource Center
Comprehensive Network & Voice Management Visit CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center and get insights into industry best practices, information that helps you to address your challenges.
CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center
Managing Voice Over IP for Successful Convergence
Voice over IP (VoIP) has much to offer in cost savings but some customers have concerns about VoIP call quality compared to the quality of traditional voice services. This white paper will help you learn how to take the right steps so that voice quality is assured.
Managing VoIP for Successful Convergence
The Changing Face of Network Management
Managing your network is serious business. This paper discusses the benefits of integrating configuration change-awareness into your network fault management solution
Download Whitepaper
Comments (4)
Microsoft needs to sue, orBy Anonymous on October 10, 2007, 5:49 pmMicrosoft needs to sue, or shut up. They've proven only that they're guilty of slander. There's no doubt that Microsoft is trying to scare away Red Hat customers...
Reply | Read entire comment
computer patents should only last 5 yearsBy Anonymous on October 10, 2007, 5:54 am5 years is a long, long, time in computer development, and any patent lasting longer than that is going to effectively throttle progress in that area of development...
Reply | Read entire comment
Based on previous patent casesBy Don Marti on October 9, 2007, 6:38 pmPatent threats against open source have been around for more than 20 years now -- one of the first GNU utilities was "gzip" which had to use a different algorithm...
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: Ballmer claims Red Hat violates Microsoft IPBy Microsoft Subnet on October 9, 2007, 5:01 pmIs this more saber-rattling by Microsoft or are they actually setting up for legal action? The story says: "'People who use Red Hat, at least with respect to our...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments