- What does Cisco have against Quebec?
- Attrition.org nails another nitwit
- Diary of a deliberately spammed housewife
- Seven cloud-computing security risks
- 20 great Windows open source projects
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS

| Data Center | Management | LANs & WANs | Security | Software | Wireless | Top 10 lists |
|---|
The subplot of the routing vs. switching debate was the fierce competition between Cisco and enterprise rivals Bay, 3Com and Cabletron. Over time, Cisco also deepened its focus on the service provider market, where start-up Juniper Networks, with the financial backing of several Cisco rivals in data and telecommunications, was becoming a formidable router alternative.
Perhaps only IBM faced a similar “gang up” mentality from other leading companies in its industry. But it was also a compliment, a show of respect and fear of Cisco’s potency and eventual dominance in the market through a combination of technology and marketing savvy, aggressive pricing and an ambitious acquisition strategy that enabled Cisco to burst its way into hot markets from storage to video.
Bay was formed out of necessity from the merger of two smaller Cisco rivals – SynOptics in enterprise hubs and switches, and Wellfleet in enterprise routers. But even the combination of two major players in their respective markets could not slow the Cisco juggernaut – Bay was eventually acquired by Nortel, which remains a distant No. 2 or No. 3 to Cisco in enterprise networking.
Before that, however, Bay combined with IBM – which had an ill fated LAN infrastructure operation called Networking Hardware Division (NHD) – and 3Com to form the Network Interoperability Alliance (NIA). The group claimed it had formed to enhance interoperability between ATM switches; but observers noted that the vendors really got together to gang up on Cisco and try to thwart the company’s increasing dominance in enterprise networking.
The toothless NIA folded with nary a whimper after three years, having made virtually no impact on the market or user buying decisions.
IBM, meanwhile, folded its NHD hand in 1999 by selling its routing and switching technology to Cisco.
Cabletron, meanwhile, committed a competitive faux pas by having its Cisco IOS router software license revoked after a trade show stunt. Cabletron resold a Cisco router blade in its hubs and switches. But after the company showed a marketing video at a trade show of the Cabletron Crusher beating the flabby Cisco Kid to a pulp, Cisco yanked the IOS license.
"We want healthy competition, but Cabletron has gone beyond that with the things they're doing," Alex Mendez, at the time Cisco's vice president of marketing for enterprise networking, said then.
and there is always a but... firebug doesnt work :(- Anonymous
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: “Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today’s Network Traffic” shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: “The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications.” Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (4)
Re: Cisco vs Juniper (Marketing?)By Anonymous on April 17, 2008, 5:48 amIn my experience the bottom line is that in almost every case, anything that Juniper has produced to compete with Cisco has been the superior product. They're very...
Reply | Read entire comment
Cisco vs Juniper (Marketing?)By Scott Morris on October 31, 2007, 12:20 pmJudging by your commentary there, it would seem more like a marketing message than an actual technical argument. Both are actually very good, both have their...
Reply | Read entire comment
cisco vs Juniper.By tom on October 28, 2007, 1:22 pmwhen it comes to Junipers market share in service providers space and enterprise security space, its not because of sheer luck, I am not sure how technical you...
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: Cisco vs. Bay/3Com/Cabletron/JuniperBy Chand on October 28, 2007, 5:37 am3Com Buy News with relations to China Puts forward interesting theory. MASS BUYING.. China did the same in Telecom . Never game huge contracts. Instead asked...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments