Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:
Networking's 50 greatest arguments. A look at the all-time greatest controversies in the history of the network industry
Data Center Management LANs & WANs Security Software Wireless Top 10 lists

Cisco vs. Bay/3Com/Cabletron/Juniper

Only Juniper has given Cisco a real challenge in the end
By Jim Duffy , Network World , 10/26/2007
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

The subplot of the routing vs. switching debate was the fierce competition between Cisco and enterprise rivals Bay, 3Com and Cabletron. Over time, Cisco also deepened its focus on the service provider market, where start-up Juniper Networks, with the financial backing of several Cisco rivals in data and telecommunications, was becoming a formidable router alternative.

Perhaps only IBM faced a similar “gang up” mentality from other leading companies in its industry. But it was also a compliment, a show of respect and fear of Cisco’s potency and eventual dominance in the market through a combination of technology and marketing savvy, aggressive pricing and an ambitious acquisition strategy that enabled Cisco to burst its way into hot markets from storage to video.

Bay was formed out of necessity from the merger of two smaller Cisco rivals – SynOptics in enterprise hubs and switches, and Wellfleet in enterprise routers. But even the combination of two major players in their respective markets could not slow the Cisco juggernaut – Bay was eventually acquired by Nortel, which remains a distant No.  2 or No. 3 to Cisco in enterprise networking.

Before that, however, Bay combined with IBM – which had an ill fated LAN infrastructure operation called Networking Hardware Division (NHD) – and 3Com to form the Network Interoperability Alliance (NIA). The group claimed it had formed to enhance interoperability between ATM switches; but observers noted that the vendors really got together to gang up on Cisco and try to thwart the company’s increasing dominance in enterprise networking.

The toothless NIA folded with nary a whimper after three years, having made virtually no impact on the market or user buying decisions.

IBM, meanwhile, folded its NHD hand in 1999 by selling its routing and switching technology to Cisco.

Cabletron, meanwhile, committed a competitive faux pas by having its Cisco IOS router software license revoked after a trade show stunt. Cabletron resold a Cisco router blade in its hubs and switches. But after the company showed a marketing video at a trade show of the Cabletron Crusher beating the flabby Cisco Kid to a pulp, Cisco yanked the IOS license.

"We want healthy competition, but Cabletron has gone beyond that with the things they're doing," Alex Mendez, at the time Cisco's vice president of marketing for enterprise networking, said then.

Cabletron was gone a few years later, having split into four companies in 1999. What’s left of the company’s switching hardware operations – Enterasys – was eventually taken private by an equity investment after an accounting scandal toppled top management. It is also now a bit player in enterprise networking, ranking No. 7 in switched Ethernet revenue market share in 2006 with 1.5%, according to Dell’Oro Group.

Juniper is having better luck against Cisco in the service provider market than Cabletron, Bay, IBM and 3Com had in enterprise. The company stole one-third of Cisco’s overall service provider router market share and remains a viable competitor and alternative to Cisco in that market. Juniper is also looking to broaden this success into the enterprise market, where it acquired VPN and firewall leader NetScreen technologies. The company is also expected to enter the LAN switching arena soon.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Partner Content

Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure

Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.

Download the Free Info Kit

Next-Gen Load Balancing

Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.

Download the Free Guide

Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x

Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications."' Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.

Download the Free Guide

Comments (5)
Login
Forgot your account info?

RE: Cisco vs. Bay/3Com/Cabletron/JuniperBy Chand on October 28, 2007, 5:37 am3Com Buy News with relations to China Puts forward interesting theory. MASS BUYING.. China did the same in Telecom . Never game huge contracts. Instead asked...

Reply | Read entire comment

cisco vs Juniper.By tom on October 28, 2007, 1:22 pmwhen it comes to Junipers market share in service providers space and enterprise security space, its not because of sheer luck, I am not sure how technical you...

Reply | Read entire comment

Cisco vs Juniper (Marketing?)By Scott Morris on October 31, 2007, 12:20 pmJudging by your commentary there, it would seem more like a marketing message than an actual technical argument. Both are actually very good, both have their...

Reply | Read entire comment

Re: Cisco vs Juniper (Marketing?)By Anonymous on April 17, 2008, 5:48 amIn my experience the bottom line is that in almost every case, anything that Juniper has produced to compete with Cisco has been the superior product. They're very...

Reply | Read entire comment

Cisco vs JuniperBy Zelalem Assefa on October 2, 2009, 7:06 pm....both have their own strong side as well weak ...cisco have very strong on certification which changes a lot of peoples life as well knowledge ...Global Knowledge...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed