- Protecting yourself from a new online scam
- Diary of a deliberately spammed housewife
- Silly Internet traditions: A concise history
- How to avoid laptop loss at the airport
- Top 10 worst uses for Windows
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS

| Data Center | Management | LANs & WANs | Security | Software | Wireless | Top 10 lists |
|---|
The argument about how best to upgrade the Internet’s main communications protocol raged in the Internet Engineering Task Force in the early 1990s. By then, experts realized that the Internet would eventually run out of address space with the original version of the Internet Protocol, known as IPv4.
The issue of what direction to take with the next-generation of IP came to a head at a 1994 IETF meeting in Toronto. Ultimately, the IETF decided to replace the 32-bit addressing scheme in IPv4 with a 128-bit addressing scheme in IPv6. The standards body tried to create other reasons to upgrade to IPv6, including built-in security with IPsec and easier management through autoconfiguration of devices.
Nearly a decade after IPv6 was finalized, the network industry has yet to embrace the new protocol. That’s because a forklift upgrade to IPv6 is too expensive and time consuming for a carrier or enterprise, with little measurable return. Instead, the network industry anticipates a gradual transition to IPv6, which will likely run side by side with IPv4 for many years to come.
Now it appears that IPv6 is finally winning this argument. The American Registry for Internet Numbers recommended in May that the Internet community start migrating to IPv6.
In fact, some industry experts predict that there are only around 1,200 days left until the Internet runs out of IPv4 addresses. Leading the charge to IPv6 is the U.S. federal government, which has mandated that all agencies support the new protocol in their backbone networks by June 2008.
The Diane's of the industry should be acknowledged for their understanding of why products fail when...- Anon
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: “Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today’s Network Traffic” shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: “The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications.” Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (6)
ipv4 ipv6 ??By Anonymous on July 4, 2008, 8:50 ami dont see the whole shenanigan about ipv4 and 6 why cant the IETF just make the two protocol versions compatible so that every one retains his/her ip and new ip's...
Reply | Read entire comment
how abt IPV8By Anonymous on April 7, 2008, 10:40 amwhy not directly switch to IPV8. if we do so,this same situation would not occur for atleast 50yrs or so. and this according to me will be carried out in approx...
Reply | Read entire comment
IPv6By Anonymous on April 2, 2008, 8:20 amIf greedy Americans could learn to share, maybe IPv4 address space would last a bit longer.
Reply | Read entire comment
NATBy Anonymous on March 16, 2008, 9:43 pmwhat is ipv4 vs ipv6
Reply | Read entire comment
IPv6: Earlier than 1200 days...By McTim on November 12, 2007, 9:54 amI think that's roughly when IANA runs out, the RIRs will distribute their space after that. Depending on global policy making, some RIRs will run out of their pools...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments