- More porn sneaks onto the iPhone
- 'Swatting' case shows need to ban caller-ID spoofing
- Why the iPhone can't be "killed"
- Nortel enterprise chief wants to bring back Bay
- US sets final emergency responder wireless pilot

| Data Center | Management | LANs & WANs | Security | Software | Wireless | Top 10 lists |
|---|
The argument about how best to upgrade the Internet’s main communications protocol raged in the Internet Engineering Task Force in the early 1990s. By then, experts realized that the Internet would eventually run out of address space with the original version of the Internet Protocol, known as IPv4.
The issue of what direction to take with the next-generation of IP came to a head at a 1994 IETF meeting in Toronto. Ultimately, the IETF decided to replace the 32-bit addressing scheme in IPv4 with a 128-bit addressing scheme in IPv6. The standards body tried to create other reasons to upgrade to IPv6, including built-in security with IPsec and easier management through autoconfiguration of devices.
Nearly a decade after IPv6 was finalized, the network industry has yet to embrace the new protocol. That’s because a forklift upgrade to IPv6 is too expensive and time consuming for a carrier or enterprise, with little measurable return. Instead, the network industry anticipates a gradual transition to IPv6, which will likely run side by side with IPv4 for many years to come.
Now it appears that IPv6 is finally winning this argument. The American Registry for Internet Numbers recommended in May that the Internet community start migrating to IPv6.
In fact, some industry experts predict that there are only around 1,200 days left until the Internet runs out of IPv4 addresses. Leading the charge to IPv6 is the U.S. federal government, which has mandated that all agencies support the new protocol in their backbone networks by June 2008.
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: “Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today’s Network Traffic” shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: “The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications.” Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (11)
IPv4 Vs IPv6By Anonymous on April 9, 2009, 3:42 ami think its a beneficial to keep the ipv4 while we embrave ipv6. the ipv4 should co-exist with ipv6, dowward compatible. therefore "we can continue running as normal...
Reply | Read entire comment
IPV6By Anonymous on February 19, 2009, 11:53 pmi think its a beneficial to keep the ipv4 while we embrave ipv6. the ipv4 should co-exist with ipv6, dowward compatible. therefore "we can continue running as normal...
Reply | Read entire comment
SpeedBy Anonymous on February 13, 2009, 3:31 pmIs their even a speed benefit to IPv6?
Reply | Read entire comment
IPV6By Anonymous on February 10, 2009, 8:09 amFinally seems like we will be switching over to the Protocolversion 6. However, I do not understand and agree to the 1200 days scenario....lol
Reply | Read entire comment
dork.By Anonymous on October 22, 2008, 11:36 amIt has nothing to do with being greedy.
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments