Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

Building virtual worlds at Boeing

Creating simulated wartime environments takes close collaboration, but it’s the process rather than the tools that determines success
By Paul Desmond , Network World , 10/29/2007
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Want to see how an F-16 will react to the latest antiaircraft weapons? Tip Slater is your man. 

As director of virtual operations for The Boeing Company’s Integrated Defense Systems group, Slater is responsible for creating virtual environments that Boeing customers, chiefly the U.S. Department of Defense, use to test the latest wares and ideas. His team of engineers must collaborate effectively to make sure the events live up to customer expectations and go off without a hitch, especially considering a four-star general may well be looking on. Boeing uses various tools to collaborate among its far-flung business units, but Slater says it's the processes surrounding the tools that determine whether they do any good.

Can you describe what your job entails?

I belong to an organization called Analysis Modeling Simulation Experimentation. Our job is to create an environment in which we can test out concepts and ideas for our customers, the majority of which are military. If a customer wants to try a wartime scenario, he can’t afford to fly or move all the military [equipment] that he wants, and you can’t afford to blow it up either. So, we provide an environment where we bring in live, simulated and computer-generated entities. 

Our job is to pull together this synthetic environment so that we can test out a concept or a hypothesis. For example, we can actually take an F-16 flying over the desert in southern California, and the pilot will see on his radar scope all of the virtual and computer-generated entities that we have in the environment. So, we’ve got a real plane that gets the signatures in his cockpit that state that there are other entities working around him, when in fact those entities are digital [creations]. And that allows us to put the assets into an environment and test them out. So it gets to be a very complicated environment.

And LabNet is the network that connects the various Boeing labs that may participate in these events?

Yes. We usually operate about 70 to 100 labs on the network at any one time. We’ve got the capability of connecting [all 700 Boeing labs], but we’ve never done it. The network is very fast and very capable. I can only handle probably 10 milliseconds of latency before the pilot actually sees it on the screen.

What is the role of Web 2.0 and other collaborative technologies in that environment?

When we run an event, it’s like a production. Behind the scenes we’ve got a number of people at each one of the labs who are managing the network and the visualization that’s going on. And the tools that they use to collaborate are instant messaging and some unique voice systems. It’s like behind the scenes of Monday Night Football. The event producer is connected to all the different labs that are involved in the event and maintaining the control of the operation. Those are the collaboration tools to make sure that the system operates.

Outside of the actual events, what collaboration technologies do you use to get work done more effectively?

When we set up a demonstration or an experiment, we have to bring people from across the enterprise to make it work. That's where we use collaborative tools. For each event we set up an event site using Microsoft SharePoint. People can post their announcements in there and drop in briefs and so forth. We use Microsoft Project on SharePoint as a communication platform. Information, charts, notes, schedules and such are posted there, as opposed to using e-mail. We use WebEx routinely [for Web conferencing].

We’re just starting to use wikis to help build events. We’re using instant messaging, primarily when the software folks are working on coding. So, if we’ve got somebody in Washington, D.C., and he’s working with a software coder in Anaheim, [Calif.], they use instant messaging to talk to each other while they’re developing the coding.

We’re looking at bringing in some collaboration tools that will allow us to do computer-to-computer collaboration. One too we're evaluating is called the TouchTable, [which is a computerized table] that exists in two locations and both operators are looking at the same screen. And they can expand the screens, contract the screens; there’s a lot of visualization involved. They can be looking at a map and deciding what to use as a target area. Somebody can highlight a spot on the map and say, ‘This is the area we’re looking at. Do you think that will work?’ Another guy says, ‘Yes, but that means the ingress doesn’t meet the customer’s expectations. We have to get something that takes us through a mountainous area or else the hypothesis is wrong.’ And they’ll have that collaboration among themselves.

What about digital white boarding?

We use digital white boards in different areas. One is facility management, where we have three facilities that we operate at the same time with customers in all three of our [major event] locations. They’ll use the digital white boards to describe what the screen layout for all the three locations is looking like, and how we are going to handle the customers in each location.

And the network operators will use the digital white board to describe things like their network design for any given operation. We’re moving some of the networks overseas and we hook into other organizations’ networks, and there are a number of rules and regulations that we have to have on how the networks are designed to meet government and company requirements. So they’ll use the digital white board to talk to each other across the ocean. We’ve been doing that for about a year and a half.

What’s been your approach to getting people to use these collaboration tools?

The primary approach is, before we go purchase a tool we say, what’s the concept of operations? In other words, how are you going to use this? We just can’t go buy a tool and throw it out there. We did that, about four or five years ago. We purchased some tools, threw them out there, and nobody used them, so it was a waste of money. You need to have buyoff where a couple of organizations say, ‘Yes, we’ll use it and here’s the concept we have in mind.’ That’s enough to kick it off.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Comment
Login
Forgot your account info?
Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed