Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Vendor claims about storage virtualization flawed

By Sandra Rossi , Computerworld , 10/30/2007

IT managers have been advised to be wary of vendor hype surrounding storage virtualization as it is a technology that is poorly defined, misunderstood and not widely used, according to Dr. Kevin McIsaac, an advisor at research firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS).

Despite all the hype, McIsaac said over the next two years network based storage virtualization will remain a niche, while thin provisioning will enjoy rapid adoption in the enterprise.

And while McIsaac readily admits server virtualization is one of the best IT infrastructure trends to emerge in many years, he said the situation is very different when it comes to storage virtualization.

"This idea of being able to layer virtualization over existing storage arrays is seriously flawed," he warned.

McIsaac said a reasonable definition of storage virtualization is "the abstraction of logical storage from physical storage". However, given the sweeping nature of this definition it is not surprising that the technology creates confusion.

"The first step in understanding storage virtualization is to recognize that many of today's commonly used techniques and technologies are examples of virtualization including a file system or a storage array," McIsaac said.

Rather than thinking of it as a specific new product or feature, McIsaac said it should be thought of as a broad technique that can be deployed at any layer of the storage hardware and software stack to simplify the storage environment.

"Network based virtualization, which involves using a device in the network to provide an abstraction layer over storage arrays, is usually what vendors mean when they refer to storage virtualization," he explained.

"The idea is to layer virtualization over existing arrays to create a single storage pool, simplify management and eliminate vendor lock-in. But this idea has significant flaws."

Organizations typically moved to an external storage array, either via a SAN (storage-area network) or a NAS (network-attached storage), to achieve higher utilization by sharing the same pool of spare disk across multiple servers.

McIsaac said applying network based storage virtualization to pool arrays isn't likely to improve this environment if efficient utilization hasn't already been achieved.

Partner Content

Explore the Ultrium Edge

The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.

Find out more

Disk and Tape Square Off

Discover what disk and tape really cost -- and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization

Download the White Paper

Don't Fall For The Myths

The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.

Download the White Paper

Will You Add Tape Too?

Over two thirds of disk-only users look to add tape back into storage infrastructure according to recent survey.

Download Survey Information

Comment
Login
Forgot your account info?
Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to moderator approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed
Save The Date!
What They Are Saying

- on-demand, instant resourcing: you can request 200 new compute instances and you can get them, there...- Craig Balding

Join the Discussion