IT managers have been advised to be wary of vendor hype surrounding storage virtualization as it is a technology that is poorly defined, misunderstood and not widely used, according to Dr. Kevin McIsaac, an advisor at research firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS).

Despite all the hype, McIsaac said over the next two years network based storage virtualization will remain a niche, while thin provisioning will enjoy rapid adoption in the enterprise.

And while McIsaac readily admits server virtualization is one of the best IT infrastructure trends to emerge in many years, he said the situation is very different when it comes to storage virtualization.

"This idea of being able to layer virtualization over existing storage arrays is seriously flawed," he warned.

McIsaac said a reasonable definition of storage virtualization is "the abstraction of logical storage from physical storage". However, given the sweeping nature of this definition it is not surprising that the technology creates confusion.

"The first step in understanding storage virtualization is to recognize that many of today's commonly used techniques and technologies are examples of virtualization including a file system or a storage array," McIsaac said.

Rather than thinking of it as a specific new product or feature, McIsaac said it should be thought of as a broad technique that can be deployed at any layer of the storage hardware and software stack to simplify the storage environment.

"Network based virtualization, which involves using a device in the network to provide an abstraction layer over storage arrays, is usually what vendors mean when they refer to storage virtualization," he explained.

"The idea is to layer virtualization over existing arrays to create a single storage pool, simplify management and eliminate vendor lock-in. But this idea has significant flaws."

Organizations typically moved to an external storage array, either via a SAN (storage-area network) or a NAS (network-attached storage), to achieve higher utilization by sharing the same pool of spare disk across multiple servers.

McIsaac said applying network based storage virtualization to pool arrays isn't likely to improve this environment if efficient utilization hasn't already been achieved.

For more enterprise computing news, visit Computerworld. Story copyright Computerworld, Inc.

Whitepapers

• Symantec State of the Data Center Report
• Monitoring and Managing App Performance
• Monitoring and Managing VoIP
• SNMP Monitoring: One Critical Component to Network Management
• SNMP Monitoring: One Critical Component to Network Management
• Best Practices for HP Servers and HP Enterprise Virtual Array in a Microsoft Exchange

View more DATA CENTER whitepapers

Webcasts

• Data Protection and Application Availability for Your VMware Environment with Veritas NetBackup and Cluster Server for VMware ESX
• Making NetBackup Highly Available with Storage Foundation HA
• Managing the End User Experience-A Real World Example of Success
• Best Practices for Deploying WAN Optimization for Disaster Recovery
• Tips and Techniques for Remote Data Backup and Delivery
• WAN Optimization Landscape

View more DATA CENTER webcasts

Special Reports

• Symantec State of the Data Center Report
• Data Centers: At the center of the action
• Executive Guide: Data Center Decisions
• Get More From Your WAN
• Executive Guide: Storage Heats Up
• Network World Executive Guide: Perfecting Application Performance Management

View more DATA CENTER special reports