- Is the Cisco MARS mission going to abort?
- First iPhone worm spreads Rick Astley wallpaper
- 10 stunning 3D buildings made with Google SketchUp
- Open source software ready for big business
- Four reasons to buy (and one reason to avoid) the Droid
Microsoft defeated a major patent licensing firm in a lawsuit over technology that helps computers boot up faster Thursday.
The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, charged Microsoft with infringing on U.S. patent 5,933,630, which was issued in 1999 to Acceleration Software International Corp. The suit asked the court to award the patent holder US$2.50 per copy of Windows XP sold in the U.S. By Microsoft's account, that could have amounted to $600 million to $900 million.
Microsoft argued that there are many ways to improve the boot speed of PCs and that XP uses different technology than that in the patent.
The jury found that Microsoft did not infringe on the patent and that the patent is invalid because it was obvious and because the technology already existed. In addition, the judge is still considering Microsoft’s assertion that the patent holder wrongfully withheld information about the existing technology when filing for the patent.
Acacia, a company that buys patents and licenses them or files infringement suits against companies that do not license, is behind the suit. Acacia bought the patent and formed a company called Computer Acceleration, which filed the action against Microsoft. Another Acacia subsidiary, IP Innovation, sued Red Hat and Novell over a 1991 patent originally granted to Xerox PARC researchers for a GUI software technique.
The plaintiff late in the case sought to add a claim against Windows Vista but the court denied the request.
This is the fourth suit that Acacia or its subsidiary companies have brought against Microsoft. One was settled, another Microsoft won during a summary judgment, and another was just filed on Monday, Microsoft said.
Comments (6)
RE: Microsoft wins patent suit over boot-up technologyBy Jack on November 16, 2007, 11:09 amThis is why the U.S. needs loser pays laws. If Acacia had to pay the attorney fees of Microsoft for losing, they'd be out-of-business. These types of companies...
Reply | Read entire comment
Wow, that's a recklessBy Anonymous on November 16, 2007, 5:39 pmWow, that's a reckless comment about loser pays law... If I had a patent and a giant such as Microsoft or any other giant company took my idea or invention, they...
Reply | Read entire comment
Not at allBy Anonymous on November 17, 2007, 2:33 amIt's not reckless. It would have also prevented the SCO lawsuit against IBM. But we're not talking about the "little guy." We're talking about one company with large...
Reply | Read entire comment
Microsoft wins law suiteBy Richard Draude on November 17, 2007, 8:04 amWhile I would like to see Microsoft lose once in a while I believe the US needs a Loser Pays Law. Lawyers take any suite and run it to the courts. If they lose,...
Reply | Read entire comment
Parasites Need to be flushedBy Anonymous on November 20, 2007, 1:56 pmAgreed. Acacia is a parasitic company which produces nothing and makes its living from those who work for a living. These sorts of parasites need to be dealt...
Reply | Read entire comment
lawsuitBy Dennis on November 20, 2007, 3:15 pmSeems like Acacia does nothing but sue people. It invents nothing and makes nothing or sells nothing. However it keeps the nation's lawyers busy. What a country!
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments