- BlackBerry Storm vs. the iPhone
- Digg's Kevin Rose: "We have to do better"
- Blogger warns: "Nortel doesn't make it out alive"
- Financial quagmire bringing out the scammers
- Verizon plays with the wrong e-mail addresses
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:Application Performance Solutions | App Performance | Networking Solution | SafeGuard Enterprise Solution Center | SOA | Test your Web Filter | Value of WDS
Under pressure to exploit the low cost of consumer hardware, IT managers are being pushed to purchase consumer-class PCs instead of those more suited to business use.
Gartner research vice president, Leslie Fiering, said organizations keen to save money are investing in consumer PCs and notebooks not realizing that they risk higher total cost of ownership (TCO) in terms of platform instability, less quality control and limited support. "There is growing pressure for IT organizations to consider purchasing consumer PCs primarily as a cost-saving measure for the business and also to appease users who are becoming more technology-astute and often want the latest consumer features on their corporate systems," Fiering said.
"However, consumer devices are no substitute for business-class devices as they lack many vital features that businesses need." Fiering said IT organizations are under pressure to justify PC budgets to senior management.
She urged IT managers to fully explain the likely TCO implications of purchasing consumer PCs and notebooks for the workforce.
"Companies should avoid the inclination to purchase consumer systems for business use and instead realize that the premium price for a business-class system reflects real value in system stability, comprehensive quality testing and extensive ongoing services," Fiering said.
"Those that pursue the consumer alternative are likely to find that their initial cost savings will quickly be followed by numerous charges and compromises." For corporate buyers standardization is essential because it affords less complexity and lower TCO.
Even minor changes to a corporate system have the potential to create incompatibility and require additional testing and system support.
"For this reason, corporate buyers are less interested in the latest new features, focusing instead on platform stability, longer product cycles, system design, quality assurance as well as security and manageability," Fiering said. "Since consumers usually purchase one system at a time, consumer-class PCs and notebooks have no investment in platform stability and no concern for standardized system image.
"Consumer systems also lack corporate features such as docking stations and often come with consumer versions of the Windows operating system and software applications."
Partner Content
NetScout is one of the world's premier providers of integrated network and application performance solutions.
www.netscout.com
Know First
Get Proactive — Move from Troubleshooting to Monitoring to Management with nGenius K2's Service Dashboard & Intelligent Early Warning Alarms
Watch the Video
Know Where
Get Rapid Performance Problem Isolation with nGenius Performance Manager and Diagnose Problems up to 70% Faster!
Learn More
Know Why
Get the Details to Validate and Solve your Toughest Performance Issues with nGenius InfiniStream and Sniffer Intelligence Modules
Read the Whitepaper
Comments (7)
Hummm there is more to a desktop than hardwareBy Anonymous on December 17, 2007, 2:32 pmWe went through the Dell motherboard capacitor issue as well. With all things they can break no matter the cost or class of machine. Things not mentioned are...
Reply | Read entire comment
Right-on right-onBy Tim K on December 5, 2007, 2:19 pmWe have been forced until recently by the IT Director to buy "business grade" Dells and Gateways (when the budget allowed that is, which was about 2-4 new PCs a...
Reply | Read entire comment
Seriously?By Anonymous on December 5, 2007, 1:39 pmI completely disagree with this article. 50%? Really? Where did that statistic come from? A cited study or referrence would be nice. What other readers have...
Reply | Read entire comment
So, another magazine succumbs to rhetoricBy Jeff S on December 5, 2007, 1:07 amOne really has to wonder why you would put an article out like this. There are no studies cited, no evidence to support mythical claims. We also have tried the...
Reply | Read entire comment
So, another magazine succumbs to rhetoricBy Jeff S on December 5, 2007, 1:06 amOne really has to wonder why you would put an article out like this. There are no studies cited, no evidence to support mythical claims. We also have tried the...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments