- 4chan hell raisers finding fame brings heat?
- The 10 dumbest mistakes network managers make
- NetApp quits bidding war in face of EMC opposition
- CompuServe closes after 30 years
- Google to launch open-source Chrome OS this year
EMC today unveiled the first major upgrade to its storage virtualization (compare products) technology since releasing the product in mid-2005, adding full interoperability with VMware and new features designed to improve availability and scalability.
EMC’s Invista is a block storage virtualization product that combines hardware and software to move data among physical storage without affecting production applications. With today’s release of Version 2.0, EMC says Invista has been tested, optimized and certified for use with VMware’s popular ESX server virtualization product.
That may be no surprise given that EMC owns VMware, but the certification is actually a “very big deal” for customers, says analyst Arun Taneja of the Taneja Group.
“Customers find that when they implement server virtualization but use the same storage, all of a sudden that storage becomes
a huge bottleneck,” Taneja says. “Storage has to be reconceptualized … in the world of server virtualization.”
EMC attempts to differentiate itself from competitors IBM and Hitachi Data Systems by using a so-called “split path architecture.”
IBM’s SVC storage virtualization product and Hitachi both use an “in band” system, in which the storage virtualization hardware sits between the server and storage, so data must travel through the storage virtualization device. EMC claims this creates a data integrity risk and slows performance.
Invista’s split path architecture separates the data path and control path, so the control information goes through the Invista device but data moves directly and quickly from storage to the server, Taneja explains.
Each approach has its pros and cons, he says. EMC’s product is scalable to larger implementations than in-band devices, but the in-band devices are simpler and can operate with less expensive switches, he says.
Invista starts at $100,000, a price that gives customers the ability to virtualize up to 14 terabytes of data, says Rob Emsley, senior director of product marketing at EMC’s software group. Invista is configured to work with Cisco and Brocade switches though the switches themselves are an extra cost, he says.
Upgrades to Invista include an increase in the number of data movements that can happen concurrently from eight to 40, Emsley says.
Partner Content
Explore the Ultrium Edge
The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.
Find Out More
Disk and Tape Square Off
Discover what disk and tape really cost and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization
Download this White Paper
Don't Fall for the Myths
The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.
Review this information
information examination
An examination of information security issues, methods and securing data with LTO-4 tape drive encryption
Read this analysis
Comments (4)
VMWRAE san storageBy Anonymous on March 6, 2009, 3:13 pmA quick question please. I currently have a blade server configured as a data base server which has 4 partitions on 400 GB of SAN storage. If I were to wipe out...
Reply | Read entire comment
That's right, they only putBy Jon B on December 14, 2007, 11:23 amThat's right, they only put a portion of the shares on the market (believe it was 10 percent). Here's some further reading on the IPO: http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/081407-vmware-ipo-price-set-at.html
Reply | Read entire comment
They only put 20% into theBy Anonymous on December 11, 2007, 11:25 amThey only put 20% into the public market -
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: EMC storage virtualization upgrades bring VMware interoperabilityBy Kevin on December 10, 2007, 8:41 pmYo, Jon: "That may be no surprise given that EMC owns VMware,". Did ya catch VMware's IPO recently? 8D
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments