- Microsoft Windows chief decries standards grandstanding
- The 5 best, and 5 worst, features of Google Chrome OS
- Federal government using PS3 to crack pedophile passwords
- 10G Ethernet cheat sheet
- Top 10 free Windows tools for IT pros, at a glance
U.S. federal agencies have six months to meet a deadline to support IPv6, an upgrade to the Internet's main communications protocol known as IPv4. But most agencies are not grabbing hold of the new technology and running with it, industry observers say.
Instead, most federal CIOs are doing the bare minimum required by law to meet the IPv6 mandate, and they aren't planning to use the new network protocol for the foreseeable future.
"The huge majority of federal networking is still going to be IPv4-based in June," predicts Doug Junkins, vice president of IP development for NTT America's Global IP Network business unit. NTT has offered commercial IPv6 services in the United States for five years.
Read related story: IPv6 vs. Y2K and GOSIP
"The vast majority of agencies will meet the mandate, but I don't think it's going to change how they operate their networks on a day-to-day basis," Junkins says. "They'll find the easiest way to meet the mandate. I don't think the mandate will be the driver for them to start using IPv6 on a regular basis."
Only 10% of federal agencies are buying services to run IPv6 traffic on their backbone networks, carriers estimate. The other 90% of federal agencies will likely meet the IPv6 mandate by upgrading their core routers to be IPv6 capable without running IPv6 traffic over them, carriers predict.
For the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) IPv6 mandate, agencies "didn't really have to deploy it. They only have to be capable of it," says Dave Siegel, director of data services product management at Global Crossing, which has one federal customer of its IPv6 service.
"To meet the OMB mandate, all they have to do is enable IPv6 on their backbone routers and then they get the check mark. And that’s nothing," agrees Diana Gowen, senior vice president and general manager of Qwest Government Services, which also has one federal IPv6 customer.
The main driver for the upgrade to IPv6 is the lack of address space in IPv4 (See a counter showing how much time is left before IPv4 addresses run out). IPv4 uses 32-bit addresses and supports 4 billion IP addresses. Because it uses 128-bit addresses, IPv6 can support a virtually limitless number of IP addresses. With IPv6, more devices can be connected directly to the Internet. IPv6 also promises to support new network management, mobility and security features.
Find out about ARIN's warning of IP address depletion
The problem with OMB's IPv6 mandate, Siegel says, is not with federal CIOs but with IPv6 itself. He says IPv6 fails to offer enough benefits besides larger IP address space, which most U.S. federal agencies don't need.
"There's nothing that you can get with IPv6 that you can't get with IPv4 in terms of access to information or sites. It's not like you get a huge improvement in performance," Siegel says. "Who in their right mind would want to implement it? The answer is people on the cutting edge, like research institutions or ISPs that sell to research institutions."
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications."' Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (9)
RE: How feds are doing the prudent thing with IPv6By jcurran on December 17, 2007, 1:54 pmTwo and half years ago when the OMB mandate was issued, it wasn't necessarily prudent to have IPv6 running in parallel on backbones in all situations. As experience...
Reply | Read entire comment
Feds can't implement what doesn't exist - need commercial prodsBy Trace Gunsch on December 17, 2007, 1:58 pmThe main point of this article is that the Feds are not implementing IPv6 as mandated. What the article fails to reveal is that industry is not making IPv6 products...
Reply | Read entire comment
Some sanity in governmentBy Anonymous on December 17, 2007, 3:57 pmI don't understand why people don't see that IPv6 is a non-starter. It's a solution for a problem that doesn't practically exist. There are bigger IT issues...
Reply | Read entire comment
Re: Some sanity in governmentBy Anonymous on December 17, 2007, 10:05 pm I don't understand why people don't see that IPv6 is a non-starter. It's a solution for a problem that doesn't practically exist. When ISP's can no longer...
Reply | Read entire comment
IPv4 shortage issues wereBy Anonymous on December 18, 2007, 7:37 amIPv4 shortage issues were mostly addressed by NAT technology in routers. I don't really see the need to rush into using IPv6 at the moment.
Reply | Read entire comment
What do the feds themselvesBy Anonymous on December 18, 2007, 3:00 pmWhat do the feds themselves think of their progress? There's not a single fed voice in this story. The merits of IPv4 vs. IPv6 can be debated, but there are many...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments