IT professionals are mad as hell about Nicholas Carr's new book, which predicts the demise of the corporate IT department and its replacement by utility computing.
Network World's Web site has been flooded with comments from IT professionals since Monday, when it published a review of Carr's latest book,
The Big Switch: Rewiring the World from Edison to Google.
"This article proves that Nicholas Carr can still get a book published regardless…of his extreme lack of knowledge of logic,
business, economics and information technology," says one anonymous writer, who calls Carr "a talentless hack with an English
Lit degree.''
Another anonymous commenter says Carr is "an author screaming for attention and not someone versed and experienced in IT.
He's just a small child crying out for someone to look at him. It's OK, we'll entertain you by at least reacting to your latest
ponderings."
The comments -- more than 50 in all -- are not your typical Internet rants and raves. Instead, they are mostly detailed, well-articulated
arguments about why companies will continue to need their own corporate IT departments to secure customer data, provide end-user
support, upgrade network infrastructure and deploy custom business applications.
The controversy surrounding Carr's new book is likely to continue, as Network World hosts an online chat with the author on Thursday, Jan. 10 from 2 to 3 p.m. EST. The transcript of that chat will be available by Friday, Jan.
11.
The reader-submitted comments are running 8 to 1 against Carr's premise that IT departments will have little work left to
do once business computing moves out of corporate-run data centers into utility computing facilities.
"I don't believe you're going to see this large transformation as Carr predicts," says one anonymous commenter. "Companies
have invested hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars, into infrastructure for their business. They are going to
just throw it all away? I highly doubt that…Many companies, like my own, will absolutely never trust their data to a 'utility computing solution' aka, Google….Downsizing, yes, IT department's dying off, no I don't really think so."
"I've worked for a number of organizations who thought outsourcing IT was the key to success, and they universally failed,"
says a reader who identifies himself as Andrew van der Stock. "Our devices and styles of computing will change (see Salesforce.com,
etc.), but the need to centrally manage a number of devices that the company owns will not go away."
This isn't the first time Carr has provoked the wrath of IT professionals. In 2003, Carr published a provocative essay in
the Harvard Business Review entitled "Does IT Matter?" In that article, Carr asserted that IT investments failed to provide
companies with a strategic advantage because as soon as one company adopted a new technology, its competitors did the same.
Carr is stirring up the pot again with his new book, which argues that utility computing will replace corporate IT departments
much as electric utilities replaced company-run power plants in the early 1900s. Carr says it is more efficient for companies
to buy utility computing services via the Internet than it is for them to operate their own data centers and network infrastructures.
"Interesting idea to be sure, but I'll believe it when I see it," says a writer identified as Jon Allred. "The fact is that
a business's IT needs are far more complex than an electricity generator. So much so that the whole idea seems more like a
pro-outsourcing political polemic than an honest look at the state of corporate IT infrastructure."
IT professionals say Carr has underestimated the role that data centers of customer information will play in retaining corporate IT departments.
"We are seeing a more commodity approach to hardware and services, which can be compared to electrical companies, but as for
the security of the firm's lifeblood, data, I believe that companies will want to maintain a firm grasp on that, no matter
all the hype otherwise," writes Barry W.
"The single greatest measure of security for data is the physical kind: e.g. not hooking the information up to a network of
nodes, any one of which represents a transfer point and an opportunity for a thief," says an anonymous commenter. He adds
that Carr "is living in a dream world of unpatented, unprotected information."
Several IT professionals point out that corporate IT departments are already running more efficient and less costly data centers
thanks to a shift towards virtualization of servers.
"There is an opportunity over time for corporations to decrease IT staff. But this has more to do with VMware than Google," one anonymous commenter says. "Why did Carr not focus on virtual technology…He missed a big opportunity to get the detail
right." (Compare storage virtualization products.)
IT professionals also argue that utility computing providers will not be flexible or responsive enough to corporate needs,
and so companies will retain their own IT departments.
"Businesses will perceive utility IT solutions as brittle, inflexible and unresponsive," says Milton Smith, who nonetheless
admits he finds the utility computing concept "interesting."
"The outsourcing model is what's being practiced right now with large corporations, but very soon they will realize that a
poor investment has been made," argues an anonymous writer. The writer describes "[Service-level agreements] not being met,
poor customer service and lack of resources for specialized technology."
Carr also predicts the end of the IT profession as a lucrative career path, except for those who want to work for service
providers. Carr says IT professionals are indistinguishable from one company to the next, and that they mostly do maintenance
chores rather than application development.
IT professionals find this accusation absurd.
"I completely disagree with the idiotic assessment that IT is dead," says one writer. "In fact, it will evolve into a much
bigger part of the future business world. Yes, utility computing will displace many of the current end user devices, PCs,
etc., but it has nothing to do with the data and services offered that business and industry uses."
Carr also says companies will no longer require legions of technical staff, and he envisions a future in which only one person
is required to run an entire corporate computing operation.
Partner Content
Blue Stripe Software
www.bluestripe.com/
Improving Application Performance Troubleshooting
Diagnosing why an application is slow is hard, at times taking days or weeks to isolate and resolve. This paper explains the challenges involved using current management tools, provides a 'wish list' for application management and analysis, and explains the need for an application system-wide approach that monitors entire applications, not components.
Download Whitepaper
Virtual Vigilance: Managing Application Performance in Virtual Environments
This paper highlights the impact of virtualization on application performance. "Managing Application Performance in Virtual Environments" states: "Best-in-Class organizations are predominately taking actions around improving visibility across both physical and virtual systems, assessing the business impact of application performance and understanding interdependencies of applications in virtualized environments."
Download Whitepaper
Application Service Requests: The Missing Link for Pragmatic ITSM
Forrester Research analyst Glenn O'Donnell and BlueStripe co-founder Vic Nyman discuss a breakthrough approach to application problem management. Learn the new approach for ITSM problem management, which provides: Rapid isolation of application slow-downs to specific components for quick problem resolution, 24/7 monitoring for proactive notification of potential issues before end users are impacted and much more.
Register for Webcast
Comments (85)
RE: The IT department is dead, author arguesBy Derrick on January 7, 2008, 3:39 amThis was a great! article and the timing couldn't have been better as I was surfing the net and doing some research for my small ASP company I started last year....
Reply | Read entire comment
Web servicesBy Tom Clement on January 7, 2008, 11:31 amThanks for the great article. The author points to a number of factors that will help move computing into the cloud and lessen the relevance of IT. I would add...
Reply | Read entire comment
has this guy ever used a computer?By Phil on January 7, 2008, 11:33 amI can't believe this non-sense. How intelligent do you think the general public is? Do they manage their utlity lines? Do you see them out there on poles with...
Reply | Read entire comment
This guy needs a new crystal ballBy Anonymous on January 7, 2008, 11:52 amAll the companies that were mentioned in this artcicle were tiny shops that were probably not very efficient operational wise and if they were is was only because...
Reply | Read entire comment
Remember the corporate cafeteria?By dmarti on January 7, 2008, 11:53 amCompanies used to run their own cafeterias. Now, they either outsource an on-site cafeteria, or the employees just go out for lunch. The data center works the...
Reply | Read entire comment
Errant nonsenseBy Andrew van der Stock on January 7, 2008, 12:02 pmThis is like saying that just because the Big 4 accounting firms exist with a wealth of general accountants, tax specialists and so on, organizations can do away...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments