- How to make new stuff from your piles of obsolete tech
- Why your computer sucks
- 10 recession-proof IT skills
- Juniper execs share network vision
- 9-year-old plots his fifth Microsoft certification
After 37 days, Microsoft issued a 43-word statement on the report of a strange, strong radio signal apparently generated by its Xbox 360 game console, and noticed by Morrisville State College, Morrisville, N.Y.
See: What Microsoft could have said but didn't about the strange Xbox wireless signal
Essentially, the statement says the problem could be anything, and that Microsoft should not be blamed because the Xbox meets federal requirements, and that it has not received reports about it.
The entire statement, averaging about one word per day, is: “Any number of scenarios could account for wireless LAN disruptions in a college dorm environment where several electronic devices operate in close proximity. Xbox 360 complies with all applicable FCC regulations and we have not received reports that would indicate such a problem.”
But the original Network World story posted online Dec. 13 did not describe a WLAN disruption or even a problem, though there is some limited and anecdotal evidence that the unusual and still unknown signal in the 2.4-GHz band may make it difficult for nearby Bluetooth devices to connect with each other.
What Morrisville is trying to discover is whether the signal actually does come from the Xbox, and whether it affects the WLAN or wireless clients, or might in the future. Microsoft is correct in saying there were no “reports” because there is only one in our story.
The story described an anomalous signal discovered by the IT department at Morrisville State College, which has deployed a campus-wide 802.11n net based on equipment from Meru Networks. The IT staff were exploring the radio environment in one of the college dorms, using Cognio’s RF analysis software. The software revealed a signal, in the 2.4-GHz band, that was quite strong and jumped around through many of the frequencies in that band.
As noted by the college IT staff, this apparent frequency hopping is not a characteristic of conventional Wi-Fi signals, but it does resemble Bluetooth, which also uses the 2.4-GHz frequency. But the Cognio software, which is designed to specifically identify the types of radio signal it discovers, identified this one as unknown.
Morrisville Network Administrator Matt Barber eventually brought in his own Xbox 360, plugged it in, and the Cognio software captured the same signal pattern. The signal was created even when the Xbox was not actually turned on. Barber speculates that it might be the continuing attempt by the console to find and connect to Microsoft’s companion wireless handheld gaming controller. When Barber shrouded the Xbox with a static discharge bag the signal dropped noticeably but was still present, according to the Cognio scan. When the Xbox was unplugged from the wall, the signal stopped.
Barber emphasized then that there was as yet no indication that the signal was actually interfering with the Morrisville WLAN access points or clients. But the IT staff discovered that in the presence of this strange signal, they had a problem getting their wireless Bluetooth headsets to associate with their Bluetooth-enabled cell phones. They had to actually touch the two devices together to set up that connection.
Comments (8)
RE: Microsoft's response to the Xbox's strange wireless signal: It could be anythingBy Dex on January 12, 2008, 9:37 amI have a wireless video sender, and it will pick up interference from the 360, the 360 has to be unplugged for the video senders signal to be watchable. The video...
Reply | Read entire comment
This article seems to forget something,By Anonymous on January 14, 2008, 1:48 pm 802.11n is not standardized yet. If Microsoft released hardware (over a year ago) that met FCC & IEEE standards - why is the article seemingly trying to place...
Reply | Read entire comment
This article seems to forget something,By Anonymous on January 14, 2008, 1:48 pm802.11n is not standardized yet. If Microsoft released hardware (over a year ago) that met FCC & IEEE standards - why is the article seemingly trying to place blame...
Reply | Read entire comment
Placing blame?By John Cox on January 14, 2008, 4:24 pmJohn W. Cox senior editor Network World This second article simply reports what can fairly be described as Microsoft's "non-responsive" answer to our query...
Reply | Read entire comment
It could be anything....By Anonymous on January 15, 2008, 10:22 amBUT, it sort of reminds me of the early days of the motherboard issue that resulted in a huge number of early production XBox units going back for, in some cases...
Reply | Read entire comment
I bet it is a way to keepBy Anonymous on January 16, 2008, 11:14 amI bet it is a way to keep interference away from the xbox controllers and allow more accurate gaming. I always found it incredible as to how accurate the wireless...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments