Simon Horman works as a software engineer for VA Linux Systems Japan. In his downtime he also busies himself working on open source projects such as kexec-tools, kexec for Xen IA64, the Linux Virtual Server Project, and the Linux High-Availability Project, which seeks to provide high availability clustering solutions for Linux.

At this year's linux.conf.au in Melbourne, Horman will leave his Tokyo base to participate in the conference and to help organize the informal Linux HA Birds of a Feather session. He speaks to Howard Dahdah ahead of his arrival.

What's great with using Linux for High-Availability?

A tricky question, as I'm obviously somewhat biased. So rather than making a feature list and comparing it to others, I'll compare Linux HA to itself over time.

I first came to the project in about 1999, which was pretty early on in its history. I had some interest in doing simple fail-over of mail and Web servers, which had come out of a need at the ISP I worked for at that time. My solution was fairly simple: only handling IP failover. And when the first release of Linux HA came about it was able to handle things much better - it could detect the failures too!

Even so, it couldn't do many things. For instance it could only manage two nodes and it didn't even do fencing -- which is required to ensure that at most one node accesses sensitive resources such as shared disks. Fencing was added not too long after, but still, things were fairly rudimentary.

If we fast-forward to today, Linux HA can handle clusters of 8 nodes or more, it has support managing a large variety of resources, it has a GUI, it's constantly improving and perhaps most importantly of all, it still supports the simple two-node first-generation cluster configurations.

So if you ask me what's great about Linux-HA, I have to say that its continuing growth.

What could distributions do to improve support of HA (or make it easier to deploy)?

At this time the HA solutions that distributions support varies somewhat. For instance, SuSE have used Linux HA for a long time, but I believe that Red Hat use a different code base. And there are of course distributions like Debian that don't ship a single Linux HA solution, rather they ship a variety of packages and to some extent it's up to the end-user to put things together.

For more enterprise computing news, visit Computerworld. Story copyright Computerworld, Inc.

Whitepapers

• Selecting Effective Virtual Directories
• Best Practices for HP Servers and HP Enterprise Virtual Array in a Microsoft Exchange
• Compliance, Protection, Recovery: A Layered Approach to Laptop Security
• Endpoint Security: Data Protection for IT, Freedom for Laptop Users
• IT Departments on Data Security: A Research Concepts Survey
• Laptop Security Tool Helps Allina Hospitals Track 97% of IT Assets

View more SOFTWARE whitepapers

Webcasts

• Managing the End User Experience-A Real World Example of Success
• Lowering the Cost of Email Archives
• Google Webcast: Why archive email? Top challenges and best practices
• High Availability for SQL Server 2005 Using Array-Based Replication and Host-Based Mirroring Technologies
• Technical Overview of Exchange Server 2007 with HP Servers and Storage
• Bringing Order and Security to your Mobile Workforce: Corporate Mobility Policy and Device Management On-Demand

View more SOFTWARE webcasts

Special Reports

• Application Performance Management Executive Guide
• Executive Guide: Building a Service Oriented Architecture
• IT Buyers Guide To: Collaboration

View more SOFTWARE special reports