- FBI warns Hit Man e-mail scammer back
- 20 tech habits to improve your life
- Industry mourns slain Cisco exec
- 10 Firefox add-ons for better browsing
- Wireless LANs face scaling challenges
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Last week, the United States Patent and Trademark Office granted a patent to Minerva Industries, a Los Angeles-based patent-holding firm. On the same day it received the patent, Minerva proceeded to sue 33 companies for patent infringement.
In three separate patent suits filed last week in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Minerva accused Research in Motion, Apple, Motorola, Nokia, AT&T Mobility, Alltel, Samsung -- and just about every other major company involved in the design, production or sales of smart phones -- of infringing on its patent, which is for a "mobile entertainment and communication device" that has "a cellular or satellite telephone capable of wireless communication with the Internet."
Although Minerva specifically names only the Apple iPhone as a device that allegedly infringes on its patent, the company accuses all the defendants of "making, using, offering to sell, or selling mobile entertainment and communication devices" covered by the patent.
"Troll Tracker," an attorney who blogs anonymously about patent litigation issues, calls the patent issued by the USPTO overly broad and says that its "broadest claim appears directed to a cell phone with a wireless Internet connection, a memory card, a microprocessor, a display panel for displaying Internet data." The Troll Tracker also notes the patent "has a little over four columns in the specification, but has almost 32 columns of claims."
The Minerva suit is one of several major patent-infringement suits surrounding wireless technology that have been brought against multiple companies in recent months. In September, for instance, patent-holding firm NTP sued Verizon, AT&T, Sprint Nextel and T-Mobile for allegedly infringing on patents related to the delivery of e-mail to mobile devices. And in November, Canadian wireless network vendor Wi-LAN sued Apple, Dell, HP and 19 others for allegedly infringing on its Wi-Fi technology patents.

Discover the capabilities your file integrity monitoring solution should have to effectively secure...
Toward More Flexible, Next-Generation Collaboration SolutionsA recent study by CIO Magazine and IDG Research Services found that while collaboration tools are...
Boost Productivity While Cutting Costs with Next-generation CollaborationIDG says that "providing employees with collaboration tools that enable them to work together...

The standard for Power over Ethernet (PoE), IEEE Std. 802.3af(tm)-2003, advanced networking,...
Intelligent Mobility: BlackBerry Technical Seminar 2008The virtual BlackBerry Technical Seminar keeps growing in popularity every year, and we want to...
Harnessing the power of communications to increase workplace performanceDue to the convergence of IT and telecommunications technologies, the business workplace has been...

WAN Ethernet services are reliable, cost-efficient offerings that are widely available and in a...
Comments (4)
re to beyond absurdBy Anonymous on January 31, 2008, 4:58 pmIt has nothing to do with Republicans or Democrats. (Both are just as corrupt btw)and everything to do with lawyers greed and jerking the system. I hope this case...
Reply | Read entire comment
Go to their url and read their "news" items.By Anonymous on January 29, 2008, 9:49 pmMakes you want to puke. Only in the USA with greedy Republicans at the helm could s___ like this take place.
Reply | Read entire comment
To paraphrase an old joke...By mwkingsandiego on January 29, 2008, 5:12 pmAppears from this example that a clever (notice I didn't say "good") lawyer can get the PTO to issue a patent on a ham sandwich.
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: Apple, AT&T, 31 others sued for infringing on smart phone patentBy Rick on January 29, 2008, 4:33 pmTwo words: Beyond absurd.
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments