- How to make new stuff from your piles of obsolete tech
- Why your computer sucks
- 10 recession-proof IT skills
- Juniper execs share network vision
- 9-year-old plots his fifth Microsoft certification
Who’s afraid of IPv4 address depletion? Not IT professionals, according to a new survey due this week by BT INS, a Mountain View, Calif. consulting firm.
Listen to a podcast with John Curran, chairman of the American Registry of Internet Numbers (ARIN), who updates the status of the IPv4 address space and explains why companies really need to start looking at supporting IPv6.
Only 16% of IT professionals consider IPv4 address depletion ``a huge concern that has or will soon force us to migrate to IPv6,’’ according to a BT INS survey of 310 IT professionals that was conducted in December 2007.
A whopping 26% of IT professionals felt IPv4 address depletion was ``no concern.’’ These survey respondents said they can use network address translation combined with VPNs to alleviate the problem.
The majority of respondents -- 58% -- said they had some concern about IPv4 address depletion but ``not enough by itself to cause us to migrate to IPv6 in the near term.’’
The survey results confirm what BT INS officials said they are seeing in the market: faint interest among IT professionals in IPv6 and weak demand for IPv6 products.
``IT professionals see no compelling benefit to IPv6,’’ says Rick Blum, director of strategic marketing with BT INS. ``IPv6 has a number of advantages including security and autoconfiguration, but none of these is compelling enough at this point for people to move. IPv4 address depletion would be the primary reason, but in North America we have much better availability of IPv4 addresses so that wouldn’t be true.’’
IPv6 is a long-anticipated upgrade to the Internet’s main communications protocol, IPv4. IPv4 uses 32-bit addresses and can support around 4 billion IP addresses. IPv6 uses a 128-bit addressing scheme and can support so many billions of IP addresses that the number is too big for anyone but a mathematician to understand. (IPv6 supports 2 to the 128th power of IP addresses.)
The Internet Engineering Task Force designed IPv6 in the mid-1990s to expand the available IP address space. The standards body added features such as built-in security through IPSec and easier network management through autoconfiguration to encourage network managers to upgrade their networks to IPv6.
During 2007, the threat of IPv4 address depletion came back to the forefront as the main reason for upgrading to IPv6. With 6 billion people on the planet and 1.3 billion already online, experts say that IPv4 addresses will run out soon.
The American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) warned in May 2007 that IPv4 address depletion was looming, and the group said it would actively encourage migration to IPv6.
RIPE, the European Internet registry, followed in October with its own warning that IPv4 addresses would run out by 2011.
Indeed, the Internet is littered with sites that show how many days are left until we run out of IPv4 addresses. The current estimate is around 1,600 days.
The Internet engineering community continues to push for IPv6. Earlier this week, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) added support for IPv6 into half the Internet’s root servers.
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications."' Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (8)
RE: Who's afraid of IPv4 address depletion? Apparently no one.By Paulie on February 6, 2008, 4:08 pmSilly argument. Thanks to VLSM and using ports with NAT/PAT, etc, this will not be a problem. Funny how this article does not mention how public vs private ip addressing...
Reply | Read entire comment
I work at an ISP where iBy Stian on February 6, 2008, 4:50 pmI work at an ISP where i design vpns. The trend the last few years is that vpn`s are moving from crypto to L2, resulting in secure networks with a single egress...
Reply | Read entire comment
Mathematician I am notBy Anonymous on February 6, 2008, 10:59 pmWhat is this nonsense about 2^128 being a "number is too big for anyone but a mathematician to understand"? Most computing professionals should understand powers...
Reply | Read entire comment
Yeah, until you run aBy Anonymous on February 6, 2008, 11:30 pmYeah, until you run a website where you're getting 1000s of hits from some IPs, and you can't tell if that's a small business, a hacker at home, or a large enterprise...
Reply | Read entire comment
WHAT?! We'll upgrade alright - because China's already doing it!By Bill Pier on February 7, 2008, 6:14 pmYou sure didn't ask THIS I.T. Professional! I can't believe you would print such a ridiculous article. It serves just either to inflame or offer more ammo to...
Reply | Read entire comment
The problem with solving allBy Anonymous on February 8, 2008, 11:25 pmThe problem with solving all problems with NAT (PAT) is that it enforces the client-server paradigm. The solutions that attempt to work around this restriction will...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments