Cisco, others sued by intellectual-property company
Network-1 claims infringement of PoE patent
By
Jim Duffy
,
Network World
, 02/11/2008
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
Network-1 Security Solutions, an acquirer and licensor of intellectual property, this week said it has initiated patent litigation against several data-network
equipment manufacturers, including Cisco, Foundry Networks, Extreme Networks and 3Com.
The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, for infringement of Patent
No. 6,218,930, or the "Remote Power Patent." This patent, titled "Apparatus and Method for Remotely Powering Access Equipment
Over a 10/100 Switched Ethernet Network," relates to several technologies used in equipment that complies with the IEEE 802.3af
Power Over Ethernet (PoE) standard. The Remote Power Patent was granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on April 17,
2001 and expires on March 11, 2020.
Also named as defendants in the suit are Cisco's Linksys division, Enterasys Networks, Netgear and Adtran.
Network-1 seeks monetary damages based on reasonable royalties, as well as treble damages for the defendants' "continued willful
infringement" of the patent.
"We have made repeated efforts, at considerable expense, to license the Remote Power Patent on reasonable terms to companies
manufacturing, selling, and using equipment taking advantage of Power-over-Ethernet technology," said Corey Horowitz, Chairman
and CEO of Network-1, in a statement.
"We prefer licensing the Remote Power Patent to the PoE industry without the distraction and cost of litigation, but will take whatever action is necessary to protect our intellectual property
rights and maximize shareholder value," Horowitz continued. "Unfortunately, many technology companies employ a multifaceted
strategy which depends on expensive litigation, delay tactics, adverse public relations, and intense lobbying in order to
avoid licensing intellectual property from small companies and inventors, leaving us with no choice but to respond with litigation."
Cisco said it has received and is studying the complaint. "In the matter of patent litigation in general, cases such as this
illustrate the reasons why a broad coalition of industries are asking Congress to reform many elements of the current patent
system, which has created uncertainty and undue risk for true innovators," the company said in a statement.
Large technology companies are lobbying Congress to pass a patent reform bill that makes it harder for companies with no intention of creating products to buy up patents and file multimillion-dollar
infringement lawsuits against other companies 3Com, Adtran, Enterasys, Extreme and Foundry declined comment. Netgear did not
respond by press time.
In August 2005, Network-1 initiated patent litigation against D-Link Systems and D-Link Corp. relating to the Remote Power Patent. After two years of litigation, Network-1 and D-Link entered
into a full-term license agreement covering D-Link's sale of all its PoE products at a royalty rate of 3.25% of net sales,
subject to adjustment.
In addition, in November 2005, Network-1 and PowerDsine settled all outstanding litigation and entered into a settlement agreement
relating to the Remote Power Patent.
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications."' Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (10)
Cisco lawsuit illustrates the murky world of patent litigationBy Cisco Subnet on February 11, 2008, 6:25 pmThe lawsuit that Cisco has been served by Network-1 Security Solutions clearly illustrates Cisco's argument that the United States' patent laws are desperately...
Reply | Read entire comment
patent "deform"By stv on February 12, 2008, 7:28 amAll this talk of a need for patent “deform” is but a red herring fabricated by a handful of large tech firms as a diversion away from the real issue...that they...
Reply | Read entire comment
Rebuttal to patent "deform"By Troll Hunter on February 12, 2008, 11:56 amNice cut-and-paste from your talking points, patent troll. Of course, much of what you posted is nonsense designed to obfuscate the truth. Some points I want to...
Reply | Read entire comment
I am that "little guy" fromBy Little Guy on February 13, 2008, 12:03 amI am that "little guy" from whom you purport to defend the large corporations. Don't worry, they can do it perfectly by themselves, even if it takes to buy the whole...
Reply | Read entire comment
rebuttal to the defender of "big guys"By Little Guy on February 13, 2008, 12:19 amI am that "little guy" from whom you purport to defend the large corporations. Don't worry, they can do it perfectly by themselves, even if it takes to buy the whole...
Reply | Read entire comment
D-Link in cahoots with Network-1By Brad Reese on February 14, 2008, 6:41 amLast year the Supreme Court limited the ability of small outfits in patent cases to get injunctions against large companies. The Supreme Court's ruling has severely...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments