- What does Cisco have against Quebec?
- Attrition.org nails another nitwit
- Diary of a deliberately spammed housewife
- Seven cloud-computing security risks
- 20 great Windows open source projects
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Network-1 Security Solutions, an acquirer and licensor of intellectual property, this week said it has initiated patent litigation against several data-network equipment manufacturers, including Cisco, Foundry Networks, Extreme Networks and 3Com.
The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, for infringement of Patent No. 6,218,930, or the "Remote Power Patent." This patent, titled "Apparatus and Method for Remotely Powering Access Equipment Over a 10/100 Switched Ethernet Network," relates to several technologies used in equipment that complies with the IEEE 802.3af Power Over Ethernet (PoE) standard. The Remote Power Patent was granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on April 17, 2001 and expires on March 11, 2020.
Also named as defendants in the suit are Cisco's Linksys division, Enterasys Networks, Netgear and Adtran.
Network-1 seeks monetary damages based on reasonable royalties, as well as treble damages for the defendants' "continued willful infringement" of the patent.
"We have made repeated efforts, at considerable expense, to license the Remote Power Patent on reasonable terms to companies manufacturing, selling, and using equipment taking advantage of Power-over-Ethernet technology," said Corey Horowitz, Chairman and CEO of Network-1, in a statement.
"We prefer licensing the Remote Power Patent to the PoE industry without the distraction and cost of litigation, but will take whatever action is necessary to protect our intellectual property rights and maximize shareholder value," Horowitz continued. "Unfortunately, many technology companies employ a multifaceted strategy which depends on expensive litigation, delay tactics, adverse public relations, and intense lobbying in order to avoid licensing intellectual property from small companies and inventors, leaving us with no choice but to respond with litigation."
Cisco said it has received and is studying the complaint. "In the matter of patent litigation in general, cases such as this illustrate the reasons why a broad coalition of industries are asking Congress to reform many elements of the current patent system, which has created uncertainty and undue risk for true innovators," the company said in a statement.
IBM spent all that money on a mass rollout of PGP Whole Disk Encryption, just when its discovered that...- Anonymous
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: “Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today’s Network Traffic” shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: “The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications.” Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (10)
Boycott the products of companies that settle with Network-1By Brad Reese on March 4, 2008, 5:43 pmA very efficient way of making the worthless penny stock of Network-1 even more worthless is to actively promote the boycott of any products manufactured by a vendor...
Reply | Read entire comment
Brad Reese is a FraudBy Equityval on March 4, 2008, 4:17 pmBrad, Are you paid by Cisco to be a comment troll? It's quite evident that you have a clear vested interest in Cisco's success in looking at your web site....
Reply | Read entire comment
Get your facts straight about D-LinkBy Anonymous on February 15, 2008, 5:25 pmD-Link in cahoots with Network-1?? Yeah right. D-Link was already sued by Network-1 for the same patent, and settled, so why exactly would D-Link now want to act...
Reply | Read entire comment
Pure Cut and PasteBy Stephen Brown on February 15, 2008, 12:00 pmIt's interesting as patent deform's remarks are a complete cut and paste job of a posting by "Steve Wren" on September 5, 2007. http://www.xconomy.com/2007/09/04/two-patent-related-scourges-addressed/ If...
Reply | Read entire comment
D-Link in cahoots with Network-1By Brad Reese on February 14, 2008, 6:41 amLast year the Supreme Court limited the ability of small outfits in patent cases to get injunctions against large companies. The Supreme Court's ruling has severely...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments