- Microsoft will float cloud OS this month
- Top 16 Chinese iPhoneys
- Pimp your ride: Cool car technology
- Laptop stolen from McCain campaign
- Cisco, Microsoft roll out server, networking appliance
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:Application Performance Solutions | App Performance | Networking Solution | SafeGuard Enterprise Solution Center | SOA | Value of WDS
A new survey by IAG Consulting finds that among two-thirds of companies polled, it is "improbable" that an IT project will be considered an overall success, due to inadequately or improperly gathered business requirements.
Fifty percent of these companies' projects could be termed "runaways," marked by at least two of these three factors: Taking more than 180 percent of estimated time to be completed, going over 160 percent of the established budget, and delivering less than 70 percent of the desired capabilities.
The other 32 percent of the companies surveyed enjoy a "probable" chance of success for IT project, according to the study, which surveyed more than 100 midsized and Fortune 1000 companies in North America.
"The numbers here came back far, far bigger than we ever expected," said Keith Ellis, vice president of IAG, which is based in the U.S. and Canada. The independent company focuses on business requirements analysis.
"One big reason that really stands out for me is that people tend to look at requirements as a document, not as a process. If you do that you're going to fail," Ellis said. "Here's one of those cases where the means is as or more important as the end."
Good requirements analysis can ensure a project's scale is minimized, but not at the expense of meeting a business' needs, according to the study. Another hallmark sees changes to requirements occurring infrequently, because the proper level of consensus has already been reached.
The study weighed development projects, which cost at least US$250,000 and involved "significant new functionality," as opposed to matters like maintenance or a rollout of new client machines. The projects consisted of either internally developed software or application implementations. Their average scope was $3 million, according to IAG.
The damage was worst when non-IT business analysts were in charge of the requirements. Those projects came in at nearly double their budgets and took more than 245 percent of their allotted time, according to IAG.
When IT workers managed the requirements analysis, the results were only slightly better, with budget overruns at 163 percent and time at 172 percent.
The best results came when business and IT worked together on defining requirements. There, budgets ran an average of 143 percent and time, 159 percent.

The Vista era of Windows is here. Yet most organizations will retain Windows XP alongside new Vista...
A Unified Approach to Workload Lifecycle ManagementDiscover how solutions that support workload profiling and enable anywhere-to-anywhere workload...
Consolidated Disaster Recovery Using VirtualizationServer virtualization is providing enterprises of all sizes with exciting new options for...

The Vista era of Windows is here. Yet most organizations will retain Windows XP alongside new Vista...
Turning information into a Competitive AdvantageCompanies today are realizing that competitive advantage is harder to sustain when based solely on...
PoE Plus: Impact on the PoE MarketThe standard for Power over Ethernet (PoE), IEEE Std. 802.3af(tm)-2003, advanced networking,...

Managing a newly virtualized environment can be tricky. Effectively deploy this technology with the...
Data Center DecisionsData Center Decisions Made Easier. Learn about the latest tech trends that impact your data center...
Closing the Loop: Extending Wireless LAN Security to Wireless PrintersEnterprises cannot overlook wireless printers when assessing network security. The print jobs and...
Partner Content
Explore the Ultrium Edge
The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.
Find out more
Disk and Tape Square Off
Discover what disk and tape really cost -- and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization
Download the White Paper
Don't Fall For The Myths
The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.
Download the White Paper
Will You Add Tape Too?
Over two thirds of disk-only users look to add tape back into storage infrastructure according to recent survey.
Download Survey Information
Comment