Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

Could IP address plan mean another IPv6 delay?

Proposal to allow IPv4 address trading could prolong Internet upgrade
By Carolyn Duffy Marsan , Network World , 02/13/2008
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Page 2 of 3

• Will it create a financial market for IPv4 address space? (Read what the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority has to say about the potential for an IP address black market.)

• Will it delay the transition to IPv6 because more IPv4 addresses will come available?

• Will IPv4 address transfers swamp the Internet's core routers with too many routing table announcements from ISPs?

"We don't know whether some of the side effects of such a policy makes sense for the Internet," admits John Curran, chairman of the ARIN Board of Trustees. Curran is chief technology and operating officer at ServerVault, a Dulles, Va., managed security services provider.

If IPv4 address trading is permitted, the likely beneficiaries are the U.S. federal agencies, universities and companies that received massive blocks of IPv4 address space at the dawn of the Internet. Back then, no one realized that IPv4 addresses would become a precious commodity. So they didn't assign IPv4 addresses efficiently across their wiring closets, buildings and campuses.

Until now, these organizations have lacked a financial incentive to renumber their networks to free up IPv4 addresses. It is rare for an organization to return extra IPv4 addresses. Notably, Stanford returned more than 16 million IPv4 addresses in 2000.

With an IPv4 address shortage looming, policymakers are stepping up their efforts to recover unused IPv4 address space. This week, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) announced that it had recovered 16 million IPv4 addresses from Net-14, which was originally used to connect older packet data networks.

ARIN's proposed IPv4 transfer policy would provide an economic incentive for organizations to free up IPv4 addresses.

"Hypothetically, a large company with excess IPv4 address space could get compensated for the work of freeing up that space," Curran says.

ARIN's proposal wouldn't allow speculation on IP addresses as has occurred with domain names because it requires IPv4 address space that gets transferred to be used.

No one knows if sizeable profits could be made from transferring excess IPv4 address space.

"Now we're telling people that [returning unused IPv4 address space] is the right thing to do without compensation," Curran says. "When you set up a process where an organization can be compensated so it can free up address space that others might not have, it's very hard to say how that system will actually behave."

The U.S. Defense Department, for example, is sitting on a mother lode of IPv4 addresses. Could this become a sale-able asset for the Department of Defense, akin to a wireless spectrum auction? Experts say that scenario is unlikely.

"It's fairly difficult to imagine circumstances where the receipts for such a transfer policy would be so large as to incent someone who was using the address space to actually stop using it," Curran says.

Experts agree that allowing the transfer of IPv4 addresses would likely delay the transition to IPv6 by several more years.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Partner Content

Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure

Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.

Download the Free Info Kit

Next-Gen Load Balancing

Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.

Download the Free Guide

Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x

Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications."' Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.

Download the Free Guide

Comments (6)
Login
Forgot your account info?

RE: Could IP address plan mean another IPv6 delay?By Anonymous on February 13, 2008, 4:03 pmI think you have it backwards. IPv4 band-aids don't cause IPv6 delays. Its the substantial resistance to IPv6 that causes IPv4 band-aids.

Reply | Read entire comment

The full text of the policyBy Scott Leibrand on February 13, 2008, 4:40 pmThe full text of the policy proposal has already been posted to ARIN's Public Policy Mailing list. You can see that post, and links to the full PPML archive showing...

Reply | Read entire comment

RE: Could IP address plan mean another IPv6 delay?By Anonymous on February 13, 2008, 6:11 pmOn the other hand, this might create a business case for some organizations to move to IPv6. That is, if they can transition their networks to IPv6, possible since...

Reply | Read entire comment

The big question regarding IPv6 migrationBy Anonymous on February 16, 2008, 8:21 pmIs your equipment capable of supporting IPv6 and is it stable? With Cisco it's highly questionable but globally where IPv6 adoption rate is high, such as in Asia...

Reply | Read entire comment

IPv4 Transfer: Could it Really Clog the InternetBy Anonymous on February 18, 2008, 9:56 am"• Will IPv4 address transfers swamp the Internet's core routers with too many routing table announcements from ISPs?" The article really makes a good point here......

Reply | Read entire comment

InfoBy justgold79 on February 25, 2008, 8:16 pmHere's some info on what they actually had to do: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-55/presentations/vegoda-reclaiming-our.pdf

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed