- Microsoft will float cloud OS this month
- Top 16 Chinese iPhoneys
- Pimp your ride: Cool car technology
- Laptop stolen from McCain campaign
- Cisco, Microsoft roll out server, networking appliance
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:Application Performance Solutions | App Performance | Networking Solution | SafeGuard Enterprise Solution Center | SOA | Value of WDS
LifeLock, which touts itself as one of the largest providers of identity theft protection services in the U.S., is being sued by Experian for allegedly placing false fraud alerts on consumer credit-history files maintained by Experian as part of its credit reporting business.
Experian filed its lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, which has its main office in Los Angeles. In the suit, the Costa Mesa, Calif.-based company claimed that LifeLock is itself engaging in deceptive and fraudulent behavior. Lifelock's business model is built around false and misleading advertising and fraudulent practices that are causing millions of dollars in monetary damages to Experian and that eventually could reduce the effectiveness of fraud alerts, according to the suit.
Experian asked the court to order LifeLock to pay it full restitution of the costs incurred as a result of the latter's alleged wrongful conduct, as well as a "disgorgement" of any profits that Lifelock may have earned as a result of that conduct. The credit reporting firm also is seeking unspecified punitive and compensatory damages, plus an injunction barring LifeLock from continuing to engage in its allegedly false and misleading advertising activities.
In an interview today, LifeLock CEO Todd Davis strongly refuted Experian's claims and contended that the lawsuit was a blatant attempt to prevent his company from expanding its credit monitoring business. Phoenix-based LifeLock is making it harder for Experian to make money off of the credit history files it maintains on individual consumers, Davis said. He added that he welcomes the opportunity to argue the legal issues in court, and that he may even see if there's a way to bring the other two major credit reporting firms into the case as well.
"We are not surprised [by the lawsuit]," Davis said. "We realized we would be hearing from them when we began taking some of their turf. We feel extremely strongly about our position."
As part of LifeLock's identity theft protection service, the company places fraud alerts on behalf of its subscribers with Experian and its two main rivals: Equifax Inc. and TransUnion LLC. For an annual subscription fee of US$110, LifeLock promises to keep renewing the fraud alerts every 90 days and to remove the names of subscribers from credit card and other junk mail lists (Compare Identity Management products).
LifeLock also offers to order free credit reports on behalf of its customers and to act on their behalf to cancel and renew cards that are lost or stolen. The company guarantees that it will pay up to $1 million over the course of a subscriber's lifetime to cover any fraud-related costs caused by a failure of its service.
Hundreds of thousands of individuals have signed up for the service thus far, according to LifeLock. Meanwhile, Davis has gained considerable attention for publicly disclosing his Social Security number on the company's Web site as part of a marketing campaign aimed at showing how foolproof the service is.
But Experian claimed in its 58-page complaint that LifeLock is illegally placing "hundreds of thousands of fraud alerts" in its consumer credit database every three months. Experian said that under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), such alerts are meant to be placed only by consumers or by other individuals who they appoint to act in their interest. The credit reporting firm also claimed that alerts should be entered only when people have already been victimized by identity theft or have legitimate reasons to believe that they are at imminent risk.
In addition, Experian said that the FCRA specifically prohibits companies from placing fraud alerts in the credit files of consumers. According to the lawsuit, LifeLock's practice of placing such alerts on behalf of its subscribers is costing Experian millions of dollars in charges for calls to its toll-free 1-800 telephone numbers, which were set up specifically for use in submitting fraud alerts.
There are other costs as well, Experian claimed. "Once an initial fraud alert is placed, it triggers costly statutory obligations for consumer reporting agencies such as Experian," the company said in the lawsuit. For instance, the credit reporting firms are required to mail a notice to anyone who has a fraud alert placed in his or her file. They also have to provide a free credit report, in addition to the one that people are entitled to annually, the company noted.
"Such obligations were never intended to be triggered by a private company seeking to profit by illegally placing fraud alerts on behalf of consumers who do not have a genuine suspicion of imminent fraud," Experian said in the lawsuit. It described LifeLock's business model as a scheme to "game the system" and said the latter company was misleading consumers by giving them the false impression that it was authorized to act on their behalf in placing the fraud alerts and that those alerts could be renewed indefinitely.

The Vista era of Windows is here. Yet most organizations will retain Windows XP alongside new Vista...
Vulnerability Management For DummiesDownload this concise book "Vulnerability Management for Dummies," to learn about the simple steps...
Security Considerations When Deploying Remote Access SolutionsEffective network security is most successful when you use a layered approach, with multiple...

The Vista era of Windows is here. Yet most organizations will retain Windows XP alongside new Vista...
Turning information into a Competitive AdvantageCompanies today are realizing that competitive advantage is harder to sustain when based solely on...
PoE Plus: Impact on the PoE MarketThe standard for Power over Ethernet (PoE), IEEE Std. 802.3af(tm)-2003, advanced networking,...

Discover why Unified Threat Management Firewalls are ready for the enterprise today. High...
The Evolution of Network SecurityWe have so many holes punched in our firewalls today that many industry insiders question the value...
The self-managed networkWe aren't there yet, but advances in network and systems management tools are making it possible to...
Partner Content
Brilliantly simple security and control solutions for email, web and endpoint
www.sophos.com
Stopping data leakage
Learn how to exploit your current security investment to control the information that flows into, through and out of your network.
Download the white paper.
Why detection rates aren't enough
Evaluating endpoint security products is a time-consuming and daunting task. Learn the six critical questions you need to ask prospective vendors to get the right endpoint solution.
Download the white paper.
Applications: taking back control
Employees installing unauthorized applications is a growing threat to business security and productivity. Cost-effectively reduce this threat by integrating control into your malware protection.
Learn more today.
Comments (5)
Identity Theft Protection LockBy Anonymous on August 16, 2008, 5:22 amI review getting good idea and view that written here about life lock they always protect the people and monitor them full time, if you getting more knowledge visit...
Reply | Read entire comment
Identity TheftBy Anonymous on July 23, 2008, 1:21 amI review this site and getting good idea and view that written here, life lock is good industry taking good steps keep monitoring identity thieves and it always...
Reply | Read entire comment
Experian's Outdated InformationBy Anonymous on March 7, 2008, 8:50 amI am glad to see Experian taken to task. The information they have on me was over three years old. When I contacted them to correct THEIR data errors the initiated...
Reply | Read entire comment
Good RiddanceBy Anonymous on March 4, 2008, 3:01 pmThe Credit card companies have for way too long profited off the middle to lower class. They have enough money already and this article does not strike me with...
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: Credit reporting firm sues LifeLock over fraud alertsBy TR Daggett on February 22, 2008, 9:29 pmI think this is an issue that needs to be clarified by the courts and in Washington. I don't know nearly enough to have an opinion either way. I'd love to sit down...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments