- Microsoft Windows chief decries standards grandstanding
- The 5 best, and 5 worst, features of Google Chrome OS
- Federal government using PS3 to crack pedophile passwords
- 10G Ethernet cheat sheet
- Top 10 free Windows tools for IT pros, at a glance
Sanbolic has adapted its clustered file system to support Microsoft's upcoming hypervisor, allowing IT shops to move a virtual machine from one physical server to another without affecting users. (Compare server products).
While server virtualization market leader VMware enables the seamless movement of virtual machines with a product called VMotion, Microsoft's Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V, currently in beta, lacks such technology, according to Bill Stevenson, Sanbolic's executive chairman.
"Clustered file systems are a complex technology and Microsoft currently does not have technology in-house that enables them to do that," Stevenson says.
With Sanbolic supporting Hyper-V, a file that contains a virtual machine image can be stored in a shared LUN storage unit, and be accessed by multiple physical servers, he says. Any virtual machine can then run on any physical host.
"To move a virtual machine from one physical server to another physical server, there's no need to change anything in the storage connection because both machines see that image," he says. "You stop it on one machine and start it on another machine."
PolyServe, a network-attached storage vendor acquired by HP last year, makes a similar clustered file system product.
The new Sanbolic Melio 2008 clustered file system is being announced Monday, one day before the VMworld Europe 2008 Conference in Cannes, France.
Microsoft, which is attending VMworld to give demos of Hyper-V, acknowledged Sanbolic's support of its hypervisor. "We are very pleased that Sanbolic's clustered file systems will be available to our customers as they deploy virtualized applications on Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V," said Zane Adam, senior director of virtualization strategy at Microsoft, in a press release.
But Sanbolic technology won't actually be embedded in Hyper-V, leaving the door open for Microsoft to build its own technology or pursue other partnerships.
"They have not bundled or OEM'd the product at this point. … That could change over the next six months," Stevenson says. "We expect to be publishing joint reference architectures."
Without a clustered file system like Sanbolic's, moving virtual servers created by Hyper-V to a different physical machine requires some extra legwork, such as copying a virtual machine image to storage that can be accessed by the second physical server.
That can get complicated when you have hundreds of virtual machines, Stevenson says.
While that extra work is eliminated with Sanbolic, moving a virtual machine would still require about 5 to 10 seconds of application downtime, he says.
Sanbolic's technology costs $5,000 for each server connected to shared storage. (Compare storage products.)
Partner Content
www.bmc.com
Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling
Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.
Download whitepaper
Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation
Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.
Download whitepaper
Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video
A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member. See how in this 2-minute video overview.
Go to video
Comments (2)
Microsoft Hyper-V add-on allows seamless movement of virtual machinesBy Microsoft Subnet on February 25, 2008, 1:01 pmMicrosoft needs Hyper V to have the ability to easily move virtual machines (a so-called VMotion capability) and so it is interesting that a third-party has immediately...
Reply | Read entire comment
still far to goBy anonymous on February 29, 2008, 3:37 pmAlthough it's cute that a 3rd party has already jumped to this solution before Micsoroft did, any IT professional with virtualization experience will tell you that...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments