- The 10 dumbest mistakes network managers make
- Six Windows 7 features admins will actually care about
- Why the iPhone can't be "killed"
- Nortel enterprise chief wants to bring back Bay
- More porn sneaks onto the iPhone
Next month, national standards bodies will vote for the second time on whether to adopt the Office Open XML (OOXML) document format as an international standard.
Whether the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) should adopt OOXML is a question that has fuelled a blog battle between supporters and opponents, ahead of this week's meeting in Geneva to finalize the text that will be put to the vote.
But will the final decision even matter?
Definitely not, according to Andy Updegrove, a Boston lawyer who works with industry standards bodies. "It really doesn't matter which way the vote goes," he said at the Standards and the Future of the Internet conference in Geneva on Wednesday.
The event, organized by OpenForum Europe, took place in Geneva's International Conference Center -- just a few floors down from the room where Joint Technical Committee 1 was holding its Ballot Resolution Meeting (BRM) to debate OOXML's future as a standard.
How OOXML came to be there provides some of the explanation for Updegrove's answer.
Microsoft offered the specification for OOXML, based on Microsoft Office 2007's .docx default file format, to ECMA International, an industry consortium which also hosts the standards for the C# programming language and for ECMAScript, the "standard" version of JavaScript.
ECMA duly adopted OOXML in December 2006 as Standard ECMA-376 and submitted it to the ISO for fast-track approval as an international standard for office document formats.
An initial ISO vote rejected OOXML, with national standards bodies making 3,500 comments on areas needing further work. This week's meeting is attempting to resolve those comments to produce a new draft, which ISO members will vote whether to adopt next month.
However, the ISO already has a standard for office documents: Open Document Format for Office Applications, or ODF, submitted by the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards and adopted as ISO/IEC 26300 in November 2006.
Whichever way the OOXML vote goes next month, some European governments are likely to specify ODF for their office and archival systems, according to Updegrove.
That, he thinks, will ultimately lead to the merging of OOXML with ODF through "soft persuasion: a small percentage of the government market saying, 'This is something we think you should do. We aren't going to make you do it, but if you don't we're going to take our business elsewhere.'"
Partner Content
Explore the Ultrium Edge
The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.
Find Out More
Disk and Tape Square Off
Discover what disk and tape really cost and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization
Download this White Paper
Don't Fall for the Myths
The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.
Review this information
information examination
An examination of information security issues, methods and securing data with LTO-4 tape drive encryption
Read this analysis
Comments (1)
Cooperation is needed, no matter the OOXML vote outcomeBy Microsoft Subnet on February 28, 2008, 7:11 pmWe've hit a second time a major player in the standards world has said the path ahead for OOXML (and ODF) is cooperation, perhaps an eventual merging of the...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments