- Mythbuster busts his own tale
- 10 open source companies to watch
- Sony recalls 73,000 Vaio laptops
- Tool to evade China's Web censorship
- Chrome and Firefox and add-ons
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Wi-Fi access-point maker Meru Networks has dismissed tests carried out by rival Aruba, which reported Meru's 802.11n technology as trailing the field.
Aruba Networks published tests earlier this week that mixed four enterprise-class 802.11n access points (AP) with several branded laptops to see which delivered the best throughput and scalability. Aruba's AP came top, while Meru's lagged behind in fourth place.
Now Meru has decided to chuck some rock-hard buns back at its rival.
"We have over 50 such customers while we know of only one from Aruba," said vice president of strategic marketing, Rachna Ahlawat, in an e-mailed response. "To our knowledge [Aruba] has yet to deploy a single 11n AP.
"Meru has done the same testing and has totally different numbers. It is our view that Aruba's test methodology is not clearly defined and as a result leaves many unanswered questions," she said.
Ahlawat backed up her argument with direct feedback from customers, and pointed to the company's claimed greater experience with 802.11n APs.
"Coming late to this developing standard has clearly not given Aruba any advantage as far as silicon is concerned. All vendors utilize the same chip sets. Meru has far more experience with these chip sets as we have had products utilizing them over the last two quarters and are offering four different APs for 11n -- the latest, the AP302 just announced this week," she said.
At the time of writing, Meru had yet to offer further detail on its own tests.
Wireless hardware is one of IT's super-competitive zones, so Meru's touchiness is to be expected. Wi-Fi vendors in the enterprise space appear to relish baiting one another.
And the company has grounds for its concerns about Aruba's tests. While technically valid, they might also not reflect real-world performance. There are, as yet, no independent, agreed tests for measuring 802.11n throughput and client scaling, so it is easy for vendors to generate self-serving figures, however correctly the tests are carried out.
In late 2007, Meru laid claim to having installed the world's first campus network based on 802.11n technology.

Discover the capabilities your file integrity monitoring solution should have to effectively secure...
Realizing the Potential of User-Generated and Social NetworkingCan communication service providers (CSPs) leverage Web 2.0 services and create new service...
Digital Asset Management StrategyThe reality of Dramatically changing media landscape, has created awareness within the media and...

The standard for Power over Ethernet (PoE), IEEE Std. 802.3af(tm)-2003, advanced networking,...
Intelligent Mobility: BlackBerry Technical Seminar 2008The virtual BlackBerry Technical Seminar keeps growing in popularity every year, and we want to...
Harnessing the power of communications to increase workplace performanceDue to the convergence of IT and telecommunications technologies, the business workplace has been...

WAN Ethernet services are reliable, cost-efficient offerings that are widely available and in a...
Comments (1)
Aruba's tests technically valid?By oshea85 on March 16, 2008, 7:24 pmJohn Dunn, I respectfully disagree. Even without standard practices for 11n throughput testing in a multi-client environment, you can be reasonably sure that an...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments