- Bank Web sites full of security holes
- SCO Group: Its future is all used up
- Maligned feature being added to IPv6
- I returned my iPhone 3G after six days!
- VPNs: Six burning questions
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
It didn't take much to hack into the heart monitoring device and get it to administer a 137-volt shock: an oscilloscope, a PC, a wireless radio with a couple of antennas and some free software.
With those tools, a group of university researchers were able to gain access to what is known as an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), reading sensitive patient information, disrupting its operation and even programming it to repeatedly administer strong electric shocks.
These tiny life-saving ICD devices are surgically implanted in the chests of heart patients, wired to the heart so they can shock it out of ventrical fibrillation. This is a heart-attack condition in which the heart muscle twitches randomly instead of pumping blood in a coordinated fashion.
They've been used in the U.S. since 2003, but until now have never been subject to a rigorous public security review, according to Tadayoshi Kohno, an assistant professor with the University of Washington, who co-authored a paper looking into the security of ICDs and pacemakers.
"We conducted some experiments that show that although there is a very remote risk of someone tampering [with] or accessing someone's implantable device, there is a risk," he said.
Part of the problem is that some pacemakers and ICD devices, including the Medtronic Maximo studied by the researchers, are designed to be remotely controlled over an unencrypted wireless protocol. That means that, given a "fair bit of time" to figure out the wireless protocol, a technically savvy hacker can start reading data and controlling the defibrillator.
The kind of shock that these devices can deliver at their most powerful settings can be intense, feeling like a kick to the chest.
The research shows that medical regulators now need to think about new issues as computerized and networked equipment is being implanted into humans, said Gadi Evron, a networking security expert based in Israel. "What I would like to see are security standards being put into place alongside with the regulations," he said.
Device manufacturers need to think more about security, said Evron, who discussed the idea of viruses in human implants at the Chaos Computer Camp hacking conference last year.
Although the results of Wednesday's study may seem scary at first glance, Kohno says the odds of someone actually carrying out this attack are low, because the hacker would have to somehow get all of this equipment within 4 inches (10 centimeters) of a target ICD.
14 years ago, I dealt with somebody like Childs. I was the new manager and the veteran techie knew it...- Anonymous
Partner Content
Brilliantly simple security and control solutions for email, web and endpoint
www.sophos.com
Stopping data leakage
Learn how to exploit your current security investment to control the information that flows into, through and out of your network.
Download the white paper.
Why detection rates aren't enough
Evaluating endpoint security products is a time-consuming and daunting task. Learn the six critical questions you need to ask to prospective vendors to get the right endpoint solution.
Download the white paper.
Unauthorized applications: Taking back control
Employees installing and using unauthorized applications like IM, VoIP, games and peer-to-peer file-sharing applications cause many businesses serious concern. How do you control these applications?
Download the white paper.
Comments (3)
Not likely to not be hacked any time soon -By Anonymous on March 14, 2008, 8:32 amIt's not like that! I need to be within 4 inches of the person, know what model the icd was, whose it was, know what variables to change. There's a lot that is...
Reply | Read entire comment
More hype than fact - for nowBy Adam Gaffin on March 13, 2008, 5:21 pmIs there any technological idea these days that doesn't get better with time? Yeah, don't put off that pacemaker, but yeah, device makers should be looking into...
Reply | Read entire comment
While interesting - it is more hype than factBy Anonymous on March 12, 2008, 11:39 pmThe whole idea of communication with a pacemaker requires less than 4 inches between the pacemaker and the programmer. This needlessly terrifies patients with these...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments