- What does Cisco have against Quebec?
- Attrition.org nails another nitwit
- Diary of a deliberately spammed housewife
- Seven cloud-computing security risks
- 20 great Windows open source projects
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
The U.S. CAN-SPAM law has chewed another alleged spam outfit, this time handing out a world record fine of $234 million (£116 million) to two individuals.
Social networking site MySpace won a Los Angeles court judgement against Sanford "spamford" Wallace and his partner Walter Rines for creating and hijacking accounts on the service to flood users with spam adverts for a range of goods.
It is the account hijacking that appears to have angered My Space in particular, some of it carried out by obtaining passwords fraudulently.
"MySpace has zero tolerance for those who attempt to act illegally on our site," MySpace's chief security officer, Hemanshu Nigam, was quoted as saying after the ruling. "We remain committed to punishing those who violate the law and try to harm our members."
The men sent 730,000 spam messages to MySpace users, some of which appeared to come from trusted contacts, rending asunder the whole concept that social networkers are in control of the contacts with whom they choose to associate.
The huge sum involved is derived almost entirely using a precise calculation of $100 recompense for every user abused, a sum that was then tripled for the deliberate manner in which the men acted. My Space also added its own costs for delivery and bandwidth consumption.
"Anybody who's been thinking about engaging in spam are going to say, 'Wow, I better not go there.' Spammers don't want to be prosecuted. They are there to make money. It's our job to send a message to stop them," Nigam said to the Associated Press.
It remains unclear how, or even if, MySpace will ever be able to claim the sums from the men, one of whom has faced large fines in the past, albeit not on this extraordinary scale.
Awards against spammers tend to be within the territory of the low millions, though one organization did recently lodge a massive $1 billion claim against a separate group of alleged spammers.
IBM spent all that money on a mass rollout of PGP Whole Disk Encryption, just when its discovered that...- Anonymous
Comments (2)
ok?By netsecpro45 on May 14, 2008, 1:19 pmand this accomplishes what? fpr the court of law?..we know the guys dont have the money...and what about me having to reformat and reinstall windows on the machine...
Reply | Read entire comment
will not do muchBy Anonymous on May 14, 2008, 12:20 pmthey don't have the money! I don't think it will help nearly as much as some good old fashion prison time. Give them 5 years in Federal prison and I'll bet spam...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments