- How to make new stuff from your piles of obsolete tech
- Why your computer sucks
- 10 recession-proof IT skills
- Juniper execs share network vision
- 9-year-old plots his fifth Microsoft certification
Sprint’s customer satisfaction rating plummeted by more than 8% in the first quarter of 2008, according to the latest American Customer Satisfaction Index, published today.
The ACSI, which is published quarterly by the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business, finds that Sprint’s wireless service customer satisfaction ratings have fallen to an all-time low score of 56 on a 100-point scale. Sprint’s rating in the ACSI places it significantly behind the ratings of major competitors Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile, all of which scored 71 or higher in the survey. ACSI founder Claes Fornell says that the drop in rankings is yet another sign of trouble for Sprint, which currently stands as the third-largest wireless carrier in the United States with more than 52 million wireless subscribers.
“Business is unsustainable in a competitive marketplace when customer satisfaction scores are as low as Sprint Nextel’s,” says Fornell.
Overall, the ACSI creates customer satisfaction indexes for 10 economic sectors consisting of more than 200 companies. Each company’s ACSI is based on a sample of at least 250 customer interviews, and the ASCI conducts more than 65,000 customer interviews each year. Sprint’s score of 56 on the ASCI is the lowest reported for any wireless carrier since the ACSI started surveying wireless voice customers in 2004.
Sprint has made improving customer service a key goal of its turnaround plan. Over the past couple of years, the company has been stricken by major customer losses in its wireless services, and the company this week reported that it had shed nearly 1.1 customers in the first quarter of 2008 alone. Sprint was also stung by Qwest’s announcement earlier this month that it had selected Verizon Wireless as its new official wireless carrier, with Sprint’s current agreement with Qwest set to expire in February 2009.
In addition to reporting on customer satisfaction for wireless carriers, the ACSI surveyed customers of all major U.S. wireline providers. In that portion of the survey, AT&T came out on top with a score of 75, followed by Cox Communications at 74. Comcast came in last place in the wireline survey with a score of 69, which is still far ahead of the poor ratings customers gave to Sprint’s wireless service.
Comments (20)
Sprint takes $50,000.00 from Small Company in OverchargesBy AllenHarkleroad on May 20, 2008, 6:45 amSprint overcharged my small (US) company for over $50,000.00. We caught them doing it and now they refuse to refund the over-payments. You can read the full story...
Reply | Read entire comment
one of the fewBy Anonymous on May 20, 2008, 2:02 pmWell either I'm the exception to the rule or this survey methodology is a little flawed, I've been a Sprint customer for nearly 5 years and I can say I've seen a...
Reply | Read entire comment
Sprint doesn't care of its customers and its only strategy is toBy Anonymous on May 20, 2008, 2:50 pmSprint doesn't care of its customers and its only strategy is to try to be cheap with price and cool phones and that is it. They don't care about there customers...
Reply | Read entire comment
well it's obvious you don't know what your talking aboutBy Anonymous on May 20, 2008, 3:42 pmcustomer care is #1 priority, it's recovering from a poorly managed merger that has plagued Sprint with problems, but they will recover.
Reply | Read entire comment
I'm happy By Anonymous on May 20, 2008, 4:24 pmWell i am also one f the few that are happy and i have been with them for 4 plus years. Allen above should get off his highhorse as he makes himself look like a...
Reply | Read entire comment
This unscientific "study" is total nonsenseBy Anonymous on May 20, 2008, 5:17 pmIt's amazing how industry hacks Like Mr. Reed are so shallow and devoid of having anything intelligent or valuable to say that to bash Sprint and without any validity...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments