- How to make new stuff from your piles of obsolete tech
- Why your computer sucks
- 10 recession-proof IT skills
- Juniper execs share network vision
- 9-year-old plots his fifth Microsoft certification
It takes a lot to shock Chris Goggans; he's been a pen (penetration) tester since 1991, getting paid to break into a wide variety of networks. But he says nothing was as egregious as security lapses in both infrastructure design and patch management at a civilian government agency -- holes that let him hack his way through to a major FBI crime database within a mere six hours.
Goggans, currently senior security consultant at security firm PatchAdvisor Inc. in Alexandria, Va., says his adventure started when, during a routine network scan, he discovered a series of unpatched vulnerabilities in the civilian government agency's Web server, as well as other parts of the enterprise.
Goggans used a hole in the Web server to pull down usernames and passwords that were reused on a host of enterprise systems. In those systems, he found further account details that allowed him to get Windows domain administrator privileges -- a classic escalation-of-privileges attack.
Using this privileged access, he was able to gain full control of almost all Windows-based systems in the enterprise, including workstations used by the on-site police force. He noticed that several police workstations had a second networking card installed that used the SNA protocol to directly talk to an IBM mainframe.
By covertly installing remote control software on those workstations, he found programs on their desktops that automatically connected the workstations to the FBI's NCIC database. "That software, coupled with a keystroke capture program, would allow an attacker to grab the credentials needed to log into the FBI's National Crime Information Center database," he says.
Like most vulnerabilities he's found over his years of paid ethical hacking, this one could have easily been eliminated with some basic security strategies, he says. For instance, the police network should have been firewalled off from the main enterprise network, and the investigators' workstations kept out of the larger domain.
Also, he says the agency should not have allowed those workstations both NCIC and general enterprise network access, since they were connected to something with such obvious national security implications. Finally, the system administrators should have monitored and blocked the common reuse of passwords.
Not as SOX-y as they thought they were
Chris Nickerson, security services lead at consulting firm Alternative Technology Inc., is also amazed by the simplicity of most hacks -- especially in this era of compliance, which should demand tighter controls. In fact, he says when he was sent to do testing at a Big Four company, he was able to immediately gain full administration access to all the organization's applications.
"This was a company that had maintained they were Sarbanes-Oxley compliant for several years. Yet I had control of the business within the first 20 minutes. I could actively change general ledgers and do other critical tasks," he says.
He also has found problems with companies that claim to be in compliance with the newer Payment Card Industry (PCI) standard. "I've had people who have spent millions of dollars on security to say they are compliant, and I walk in and pop open their main credit card processing system within 10 minutes."
Comments (8)
Holy CrapBy Anonymous on May 29, 2008, 10:04 amWOW, thats very interesting at how secure people think the web really is. I have only been in the IT industry a year now and my goal is to be a Network engineer...
Reply | Read entire comment
Last page missing links?By Anonymous on May 30, 2008, 5:01 pmThe final paaragraph hints at further resources. Are there links to "five steps to successful and cost-effective penetration testing" and "five free pen-testing...
Reply | Read entire comment
Balance between functional usage and securityBy Anonymous on May 31, 2008, 2:20 amThe hard part is to maintain the balance between enabling the functions the end user needs to perform their job, while at the same time securing the machine and...
Reply | Read entire comment
Requested link was on page 2 of storyBy Anonymous on June 2, 2008, 8:35 amThe author really should have had the link at the end where those interested could have followed it. It is actually on the second page of the 4 web pages for this...
Reply | Read entire comment
The balance..By tuomoks on June 9, 2008, 12:50 amActually I think functionality and security go hand in had a good way. Why even bother the end user with something they are not supposed to see, do or just mess...
Reply | Read entire comment
Secruity and FunctionalityBy Anonymous on June 18, 2008, 3:15 pmOur government's files should be the most highly secured and guarded. The ramifications to the wrong person having access to those files could expose many potential...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments