- Palm unwraps the unlocked 3G Treo Pro
- FTC targets prerecorded telemarketing drivel
- New algorithm offers hope for old routers
- Microsoft hires Seinfeld to bite Apple
- 'White space' spectrum debate to get hotter
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
A Texas company that offered supposedly free software on CDs, but then billed customers for a software-continuity program they didn't sign up for, will pay nearly US $2.2 million to settle charges levied by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, the agency announced.
The FTC, in a civil lawsuit, said defendants Think All Publishing, successor company to Manay Software, and owner Yuri Mintskovsky, ran a Web site that offered consumers a free CD containing software if they agreed to pay shipping and handling of $1.99 to $2.99.
Consumers had to provide their names, addresses and a credit or debit card number to cover postage and handling, the FTC said Wednesday. Consumers who signed up for the free CD were then offered three more free CDs with no additional shipping or handling fees.
Before consumers completed the transaction, they had to check a box saying they agreed to the terms of use. The terms of use included software licensing arrangements and usage rules, and many consumers checked the box without clicking on an included hyperlink or reading the form, the FTC said.
The seventh paragraph of the single-spaced document included language that "contradicted the free software claim," the FTC said in a news release. That language said consumers would be required to send back two of the four supposedly free CDs within 10 days, or they would be charged a fee of $39 to $49. In addition, it said consumers would be enrolled in a software-continuity program and would receive additional CDs in the future for a cost of $39 to $49, unless they returned the CDs within 10 days.
Most consumers did not know about these charges or the continuity plan until they were billed, the FTC alleged. The defendants did not adequately notify consumers, making it impossible for consumers to avoid the charges, the agency said.
The FTC charged the defendants with unfair and deceptive practices that violate the FTC Act. The agency also charged them with violating the Unordered Merchandise Statute, which prohibits billing recipients for merchandise they did not order. The FTC asked the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District, Sherman Division, to halt to the unfair and deceptive practices and to order the defendants to give up their profits from the operation.
Partner Content
Brilliantly simple security and control solutions for email, web and endpoint
www.sophos.com
Stopping data leakage
Learn how to exploit your current security investment to control the information that flows into, through and out of your network.
Download the white paper.
Why detection rates aren't enough
Evaluating endpoint security products is a time-consuming and daunting task. Learn the six critical questions you need to ask to prospective vendors to get the right endpoint solution.
Download the white paper.
Unauthorized applications: Taking back control
Employees installing and using unauthorized applications like IM, VoIP, games and peer-to-peer file-sharing applications cause many businesses serious concern. How do you control these applications?
Download the white paper.
Comments (1)
bullBy Anonymous on June 13, 2008, 5:50 pmthey should have been put in jail,all their assets confiscated and consumers refunded.
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments