- 4chan hell raisers finding fame brings heat?
- The 10 dumbest mistakes network managers make
- NetApp quits bidding war in face of EMC opposition
- CompuServe closes after 30 years
- Google to launch open-source Chrome OS this year
ORLANDO -- It's not incumbent upon Cisco to own a company like VMware to broaden its presence in the data center, CEO John Chambers said this week.
Speaking during a roundtable discussion with reporters at the Cisco Live! customer conference, Chambers essentially dismissed speculation that Cisco would make a run at storage titan EMC or virtualization software vendor VMware, of which EMC owns 84%, as it deepens its penetration into the data center.
"Our ideal acquisition is 100 engineers with a product just about to come to market," Chambers said. "Margins aren't good in storage devices."
Cisco will, however, deepen its relationships with data center stalwarts like EMC and VMware (Read our Q&A with VMware CEO Diane Greene), and would like to with IBM, Chambers said. IBM has been reluctant to partner more tightly with Cisco in the data center, Chambers said, perhaps because of Cisco's broadening ambitions and competitive challenge.
"We're still at the altar," Chambers said. "We think [a tighter IBM/Cisco partnership] is in the best interests of employees, shareholders and customers" not only in the data center, but in the home and with service providers. "We want to make the pie bigger instead of smaller."
Chambers said Cisco's partnership with Microsoft is a model worth emulating. The companies acknowledge each other's ubiquity in the network and on the desktop and maintain interoperability, but also compete hotly in areas like unified communications.
As for the data center transformation opportunity – virtualizing resources and converging them onto a single network – Chambers says he's not sure whether Cisco's larger opportunity is in greenfield or legacy data centers immersed in infrastructure that outdates Cisco.
"We'll play aggressively in both," he said. "But the traditional players have not brought innovation [to the data center] in years."
On the consumer side, Chambers said the price for a residential version of Cisco's TelePresence virtual conferencing system, expected within the next year, will be less than $10,000.
"We think $10,000 is very fair but it will be below that," he said.
Previously, Cisco had said that a consumer version of a TelePresence system would cost about $1,000. TelePresence systems currently range from $34,000 for the small office/home office version, to $300,000 for a larger enterprise conference room.
Partner Content
Explore the Ultrium Edge
The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.
Find Out More
Disk and Tape Square Off
Discover what disk and tape really cost and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization
Download this White Paper
Don't Fall for the Myths
The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.
Review this information
information examination
An examination of information security issues, methods and securing data with LTO-4 tape drive encryption
Read this analysis
Comments (3)
Rumors about Cisco/Uplogix discussionsBy Anonymous on June 26, 2008, 4:53 pmThe Cisco Live! and Gartner trade shows this past week generated some rumers about discussions with Uplogix. Secure remote management is gaining ground and the Uplogix...
Reply | Read entire comment
It would be stupid for Cisco to play favorites and disenfranchisBy Anonymous on June 25, 2008, 4:06 pmIt would be stupid for Cisco to play favorites and disenfranchise the other vendors that do not currently compete with Cisco. In areas like storage and OS virtualization...
Reply | Read entire comment
Cisco isn't drooling over server virtualization marketBy Cisco Subnet on June 25, 2008, 1:18 pmWhile the Cisco-buys-EMC rumors are interesting, it would downright surprising if Cisco really took on that deal. As Chambers says, the company doesn't need...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments