Microsoft repairs PCs crippled by XP SP3 update
By Gregg Keizer
,
Computerworld
, 06/29/2008
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
Nearly three weeks after security vendor Symantec released a free tool to clean up PCs crippled by the Windows XP Service Pack 3 (SP3) update, Microsoft issued a fix that should reestablish lost Internet and wireless connections.
Earlier this week, Microsoft posted a hotfix for a problem users first reported in mid-May. Users of Symantec's consumer security
software said that after updating their PCs to XP SP3, a bug emptied Windows' Device Driver and deleted network connections.
Although Symantec initially blamed Microsoft for the snafu, it later accepted some responsibility. In late May, Symantec acknowledged
that Microsoft's updating process and a security feature in its own Norton-branded software combined to swamp the Windows
registry with hundreds, sometimes thousands, of bogus and corrupted keys. That security feature, dubbed "SymProtect" by Symantec,
was designed to protect the company's security software from attack by guarding against unauthorized changes to the registry.
Although Microsoft had previously declined to comment on the episode, the support document that accompanied the hotfix fingered Symantec's software. "This problem occurs when the Fixccs.exe process is called during
the Windows XP SP3 installation," said Microsoft. "This process creates some intermediate registry subkeys, and it later deletes
these subkeys. In some cases, some anti-virus applications may not let the Fixccs.exe process delete these intermediate registry
subkeys."
The hotfix replaces the Fixccs.exe file with an updated version, but it can only be applied if the user has booted into Windows'
Safe Mode, according to the support document.
Symantec has contended that other security software with registry-change monitoring defenses also caused similar problems
for users updating to Windows XP SP3, but there have been few reports logged to Microsoft's support forums. Microsoft, however,
intimated that Symantec might not be alone when it used the generic, and plural, "some antivirus applications" in its explanatory
document.
Users can download the hotfix from the Microsoft site.
Microsoft has not yet begun serving up Windows XP SP3 via Windows Update's Automatic Updates feature, and conceivably could
prevent machines that have specific security programs installed from receiving the update. It's already done exactly that
by blocking other systems, notably those running AMD processors, from getting XP SP3 to sidestep an endless reboot bug.
For more enterprise computing news, visit Computerworld. Story copyright Computerworld, Inc.
Comments (6)
Plus ça change......By Scunnerous on June 30, 2008, 10:00 pmReminds me of when I first installed SP2 for WinXP - the Symantec AV software, which had been purchased only a year before, quit working. Symantec's "solution":...
Reply | Read entire comment
That's why I use AVG....By Anonymous on July 1, 2008, 1:38 amI have NEVER used Symantec's software, and that's one reason why. You would think such big companies such as Symantec and McAfee would have the best performance...
Reply | Read entire comment
I was a Symantec fan...By Anonymous on July 1, 2008, 2:37 amI was a Symantec fan... but that changed years ago. Now I would not recommend Symantec or Norton products to anyone, home or business clients. AVG's free products...
Reply | Read entire comment
What about the IE7 Upgrade?By Anonymous on July 1, 2008, 10:20 amI had the same problem, loss of internet connectivity, when I tried to install IE7 over SP3. I had no issues installing SP3 and I'm running BitDefinder AV software.
Reply | Read entire comment
nortonBy Anonymous on July 7, 2008, 4:29 pmWith the many options of good security products that are on the market, both paid and free, I would use Symantec in the alphabetical order it falls. Too many of...
Reply | Read entire comment
nortonBy Anonymous on July 7, 2008, 4:29 pmWith the many options of good security products that are on the market, both paid and free, I would use Symantec in the alphabetical order it falls. Too many of...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments