Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

DNS researcher convinces skeptics that bug is serious

By Gregg Keizer , Computerworld , 07/11/2008
  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print

Once-skeptical security researchers now agree that the critical bug in the Internet's Domain Name System (DNS) protocol is the real deal.

Dan Kaminsky, the researcher who uncovered the design flaw in DNS and then led a months-long effort to coordinate the large-scale, multivendor patching that was unveiled Tuesday, acknowledged he had made a mistake in not reaching out to the security research community earlier.

"I screwed up," said Kaminsky, director of penetration testing at Seattle-based IOActive Inc., in an interview Thursday. "I'm the DNS guy in the Black Hat community, so if I'm saying it's bad, then it's bad. It didn't occur to me that people would question it.

"My concern the entire time was that the public would panic, so I was thinking, 'How do we get an orderly patch when this has never happened before?'" Kaminsky said. "I needed the vendors behind me and the DNS community. And I had that in spades."

But what he didn't have was the support of security researchers, including some notable names who, after the Tuesday announcement, were dubious about Kaminsky's claims.

Thomas Ptacek of Matasano Security led the charge, saying that the DNS cache poisoning attack that Kaminsky alluded to was old news. "Saying it here first: doubting there's really any meat to this DNS security announcement," said Ptacek on Tuesday on Twitter.

Dino Dai Zovi, another security researcher -- who is perhaps best known for walking off with a cool US$10,000 after hacking a Mac last year in the inaugural "Pwn to Own" contest -- also was skeptical.

In a conference call yesterday that was arranged by security analyst Rich Mogull of Securosis, who Kaminsky had asked to help organize the Tuesday announcement, Kaminsky briefed Ptacek, Dai Zovi and at least one other researcher on the details of his findings.

"I broke a huge rule: I didn't bring in anyone else from the research community," said Kaminsky in explaining why he felt he needed to deviate from his plan to withhold technical details until early next month, when he presents at the Black Hat security conference. "I forgot that, no, you don't get to make a whole bunch of noise without some technical details to back it up," Kaminsky said. "[As] security researchers, we need the ability to call 'bullsh**' on people."

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

Brilliantly simple security and control solutions for email, web and endpoint

www.sophos.com

Stopping data leakage

Learn how to exploit your current security investment to control the information that flows into, through and out of your network.

Download the white paper.

Why detection rates aren't enough

Evaluating endpoint security products is a time-consuming and daunting task. Learn the six critical questions you need to ask prospective vendors to get the right endpoint solution.

Download the white paper.

Applications: taking back control

Employees installing unauthorized applications is a growing threat to business security and productivity. Cost-effectively reduce this threat by integrating control into your malware protection.

Learn more today.

Comment
Login
Forgot your account info?
Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed