Two years ago, the Chinese government adopted a controversial approach known as network address translation to bridge the gap between IPv4, the Internet's main communications protocol, and an emerging Internet standard known as IPv6.

Now, the Chinese are proposing their NAT approach — dubbed IVI — as a possible solution to other governments and carriers grappling with the looming depletion of IPv4 addresses and the long-anticipated upgrade to IPv6.

IPv4 uses 32-bit addresses and can support 4.3 billion devices connected directly to the Internet. IPv6 uses 128-bit addresses and can support a virtually limitless number of Internet-enabled devices, such as PCs, printers, gaming systems, cell phones and appliances.

IPv6 was designed a decade ago but hasn't been widely deployed outside of Asia, where IPv4 addresses are scarce. The Chinese government leads the world in IPv6 deployment, with the U.S. government working hard to catch up.  

Usually, the Chinese are quiet about their Internet operations because they closely monitor and censor Web surfing by their citizens. However, details about the Chinese IPv6 network have trickled out over the years. (View a slideshow on how the Chinese Internet is different.)

Earlier this month, Chinese researchers outlined their IVI approach to the Internet's leading standards body, the Internet Engineering Task Force. In a document published July 6, engineers from the China Education and Research Network (CERNET) and Tsinghua University described their approach for co-existence and transition between IPv4 and IPv6.  

To bridge between its IPv4-only CERNET and IPv6-only CERNET2, the Chinese developed IVI, a mechanism that embeds subsets of IPv4 addresses in prefix-specific IPv6 addresses. IVI allows these IPv6 addresses to communicate directly with global IPv6 networks and through stateless gateways to IPv4 networks.

The IVI scheme supports end-to-end address transparency, incremental deployment of IPv6 and performance optimization in networks that use multiple carriers, according to the document.

The Chinese are pitching IVI as a better way for IPv6 hosts to communicate with IPv4 networks than the IETF's current approaches. Existing standards propose running dual-stack hosts that support both IPv4 and IPv6 and tunneling, which involves encapsulating IPv6 packets to send over IPv4 networks.