- Nokia's new N97 vs. the iPhone
- Talk-powered cell phones?
- FBI: Copper thieves jeopardize U.S. infrastructure
- 10 Microsoft research projects
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
Debate is reaching a fever pitch over a new security feature in Firefox 3.0 that throws out a warning page to users when a Web site's SSL certificate is expired or has not been issued by a trusted third party.
Critics say that Firefox 3.0 is putting undue fear and confusion into everyday Web surfers, makes it difficult to set exceptions for certain Web sites, and is forcing Web site operators to do business with specific vendors of SSL certificates or risk the appearance that their Web sites are broken.
Browsers require SSL certificates to initiate encrypted communications and to validate the authenticity of a site.The Mozilla.com Web site, where Firefox 3.0 can be freely downloaded, defends the new feature, saying SSL certificates not issued by a validated certificate authority -- so-called self-signed certificates (SSC) -- don't provide even basic validation; and expired certificates should not be viewed as "harmless" because they open avenues for hackers.
Mozilla officials say the new feature helps curb electronic eavesdropping or so-called "man in the middle" attacks.
The certificate issue is cropping up on such major sites as the U.S. Army's, which uses certificates issued by the Department of Defense. In the Army's case, Firefox does not recognize the DOD as an authorized certificate provider. Firefox, therefore, rejects the Army site's certificate and defaults to a Web page showing a traffic-cop icon and proclaiming "secure connection failed" and that the site's certificate can not be trusted.
The problem also has surfaced with expired SSL certificates on such sites as Google Checkout and LinkedIn. The issue also could crop up on intranet sites that use SSCs and force IT administrators to configure exceptions within the browser or other workarounds.
Some are saying that Firefox 3.0 is out of line.
The Pingdom.com blog this week took Mozilla to task, saying the issue could affect tens of thousands of sites. "People most in need of a clear and explicit warning regarding SSL certificates are inexperienced users, and those are not very likely to understand the error message that Firefox 3 is displaying. A large portion will simply be scared away, thinking that the Web site is broken," according to the blog.
Partner Content
Brilliantly simple security and control solutions for email, web and endpoint
www.sophos.com
Stopping data leakage
Learn how to exploit your current security investment to control the information that flows into, through and out of your network.
Download the white paper.
Why detection rates aren't enough
Evaluating endpoint security products is a time-consuming and daunting task. Learn the six critical questions you need to ask prospective vendors to get the right endpoint solution.
Download the white paper.
Applications: taking back control
Employees installing unauthorized applications is a growing threat to business security and productivity. Cost-effectively reduce this threat by integrating control into your malware protection.
Learn more today.
Comments (23)
Re: What about internal sitesBy Jason Smith jr. on September 4, 2008, 10:40 pmYour director of IT needs to be told to stand up a single CA for the entire organization and use that CA for all in house sites that you don't want to spend money...
Reply | Read entire comment
Incomptence is at the root of the complainers By Anonymous on August 28, 2008, 9:28 amAnyone complaining about the certificate notification feature of Firefox is obviously incompetent. This feature should have existed from a long, long time ago based...
Reply | Read entire comment
Certificates fulfil more than one functionBy Anonymous on August 27, 2008, 11:20 amOne function of certificates is to authenticate sites. The other, equally important function, is to encrypt the connection. For an application that needs the encryption...
Reply | Read entire comment
Good job, MozillaBy Anonymous on August 26, 2008, 3:50 pmIt is quite disconcerting that there is an uproar about a feature that forces the sloppy web admins to pull up their socks. As someone already commented, any legitimate...
Reply | Read entire comment
What about internal sites?By Anonymous on August 26, 2008, 3:21 pmMy IT firm uses a lot of self-signed and built-in certs for in-house work and this new feature of Firefox has caused our Director of IT to decide that we shouldn't...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments