- How to make new stuff from your piles of obsolete tech
- Why your computer sucks
- 10 recession-proof IT skills
- Juniper execs share network vision
- 9-year-old plots his fifth Microsoft certification
Controller-based, pervasive wireless LANs are quickly become a standard feature of enterprise networks, according to a new study by BT North America.
And nearly one-third of enterprises are migrating to the high-throughput draft 802.11n WLAN standard within the next 12 months. The study's authors say that rate of adoption for a not-yet-ratified standard is unprecedented, indicating that 11n benefits are urgently needed by a significant number of enterprise sites. But half of the respondents still say there's no rush, and no plans to make that move.
The Web-based survey was completed by IT professionals from 226 companies. Forty-three percent of those companies had 1,000 or less IT employees; 28% had 1,000 to10,000; and one-quarter had more than 10,000. (Compare enterprise WLAN products).
Thirty-nine percent of the survey respondents said they have controller-based WLAN architectures, and 22% more are either actively migrating to that or plan to. The trend is most pronounced in larger companies, according to Rick Blum, director of strategic marketing for the BT consulting group, and author of the study.
But controller solutions can become very expensive for companies with lots of branch offices or remote locations. One start-up, Aerohive, has eliminated the controller as a separate box: It's offering a distributed WLAN architecture that still permits centralized management. A 102-store 7-Eleven chain in Oklahoma recently deployed the Aerohive gear.
The main enterprise driver for WLANs is making employees mobile, increasing collaboration and/or improving productivity, says Greg Taylor, practice lead for BT's WLAN consulting practice. Sixty-one percent of the sample listed these as "very important."
Taylor says there is little formally published literature on improved efficiencies, but some create internal studies in an attempt to document improvements. But measuring in hard dollars is rare, he says. "It's more about the whole feature set associated with wireless LANs," he says.
That's often coupled with a desire to deploy a secure wireless infrastructure to pre-empt unauthorized and vulnerable rogue WLAN deployments within the enterprise.
But those "softer" criteria also make it likely that WLAN expansions or upgrades may be sidelined in favor of higher priority projects, such as data center virtualization, which demonstrate hard-dollar cost justification, both men agreed.
The shift to 11n is under way for about one-third of the sample. Another 20% said they plan to adopt 11n starting 12 months or more from now. "The migration to 11n plays into the laptop [technology] refresh cycle," Taylor says. As new laptops with integrated 11n chipsets show up in the enterprise, "that adds to the justification for migrating the WLAN to 11n," he says. The typical enterprise refresh cycle is two to five years, according to Taylor.
The BT consultants say they see customers most often adopting the draft 11n infrastructure in brand-new construction, where it's matched with a high-capacity wired infrastructure. "You need gigabit switches and 10-gig backbones on the wired side," Taylor says. "The mixed -11abg and 11n mode will provide minimal gains."
Comments (4)
BT=bluster telecomBy Schratboy on August 25, 2008, 4:53 pmI smell somebody trying to sell something. The security implications aside, I think adoption rates aren't any where near the levels the study indicates. IT departments...
Reply | Read entire comment
Huh????By Anonymous on August 26, 2008, 8:53 pmConfusing article at best. What does the Adoption bill proposed - 802.11n (in congress, I assume?) have to do with Computer stuff. While adoption agencies would...
Reply | Read entire comment
"bluster"By John Cox on August 27, 2008, 12:59 pmJohn W. Cox senior editor Network World All we can say about these numbers is that the reflect the answers of the IT professionals who voluntarily participated...
Reply | Read entire comment
Huh.By John Cox on August 27, 2008, 1:03 pmJohn W. Cox senior editor Network World I thought about getting into federal child-adoption policies but decided to wait and insert it into another computer mumb-jumbo...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments