- How to make new stuff from your piles of obsolete tech
- Why your computer sucks
- 10 recession-proof IT skills
- Juniper execs share network vision
- 9-year-old plots his fifth Microsoft certification
With costs related to a rogue network administrator's hijacking of the city's network now estimated at $1 million, city officials say they are searching for a mysterious networking device hidden somewhere on the network.
The device, referred to as a "terminal server" in court documents, appears to be a router that was installed to provide remote access to the city's Fiber WAN network, which connects municipal computer and telecommunication systems throughout the city. City officials haven't been able to log in to the device, however, because they do not have the username and password. In fact, the city's Department of Telecommunications and Information Services (DTIS) isn't even certain where the device is located, court filings state.
The router was discovered on Aug. 28. When investigators attempted to log in to the device, they were greeted with what appears to be a router login prompt and a warning message saying "This system is the personal property of Terry S. Childs," according to a screenshot of the prompt filed by the prosecution.
The disclosure is the latest turn in a bizarre story that has made headlines in San Francisco for the past two months. Childs, a network administrator with DTIS, was arrested July 12 on charges of network tampering after he refused to provide his superiors with administrative access to the city of San Francisco's network, which he had managed for the past five years.
Initially Childs refused to hand over administrative passwords to the city's routers, which had been configured to wipe out all configuration information if they were reset.
After a dramatic jailhouse meeting with San Francisco's mayor one week after his arrest, Childs handed over the data, but DTIS Chief Administrative Officer Ron Vinson said Wednesday that the city now expects to spend more than $1 million to clean up the mess. To date, DTIS has paid out $182,000 to Cisco contractors and $15,000 in overtime costs, he said in an e-mail interview.
The city has also set aside a further $800,000 to address the problem. Vinson did not specify what the additional money was expected to cover, but if the city has to hire network consultants to remap, reconfigure and lock down its network, this would not be an unreasonable estimate. The city has also retained a security consulting firm called Secure DNA to conduct a vulnerability assessment of its network.
Meanwhile, Childs remains in county jail, held on a $5 million bond. His supporters say he is a dedicated city employee who was pushed too far by incompetent management, while the county's district attorney argues that he concealed a violent criminal past when hired by the city and remains a threat to the city's network. Childs served prison time following a 1983 robbery conviction, a fact he concealed in his city job application forms.
In court filings, prosecutors say Childs has not provided passwords to city-owned encrypted hard drives or access to two Corsair Flash Survivor USB drives that may contain sensitive information.
Comments (49)
SF FubarBy Dr. Bob Hacker on September 11, 2008, 9:00 amThe SF case reveals the sorry state of IT management in the USA; the common belief, based on the dubious prof, is that IT does not matter so anybody can do it. Big...
Reply | Read entire comment
Management are Clearly IdiotsBy Anonymous on September 11, 2008, 11:19 amI don't think what the admin did earlier was right, but come on now, where's the documentation? Change control? It shows the department is in a very sad state...
Reply | Read entire comment
Take It Offline The Old Fashi on WayBy Anonymous on September 11, 2008, 11:31 amJust DDOS the thing offline. DUH
Reply | Read entire comment
That is exactly what I was just thinking! It is trivial to tracBy Anonymous on September 11, 2008, 11:51 amThat is exactly what I was just thinking! It is trivial to trace a network device's physical location, so they are obviously either just using this thing to make...
Reply | Read entire comment
How was this allowed to happen?By Anonymous on September 11, 2008, 12:05 pmWhere is Childs supervisor in this? How is it that a single individual was allowed to be the only person in possession of the core network passwords anyway? Any...
Reply | Read entire comment
1$ million, ReallyBy Anonymous on September 11, 2008, 12:15 pmHow on earth can they justify a price tag of 1 million in damages, sorry but I just don't buy it. BS!
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments