EFF, Public Knowledge sue US gov't over secret IP pact
By
Grant Gross
,
IDG News Service
, 09/18/2008
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
Two digital rights advocacy groups have filed a lawsuit against the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) in an attempt
to get the office to turn over information about a secret international treaty being negotiated to step up cross-border enforcement
of copyright and piracy laws.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Public Knowledge filed the lawsuit Wednesday after USTR ignored their repeated
requests to turn over information about the proposed Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA).
ACTA could include an agreement for the U.S., Canada, the European Commission and other nations that are part of the talks
to enforce each other's intellectual-property (IP) laws, with residents of each country subject to criminal charges when violating
the IP laws of another country, according to a supposed ACTA discussion paper posted on Wikileaks.org in May.
The document posted on Wikileaks also talks about increasing border searches in an effort to find counterfeit goods, encouraging
ISPs (Internet service providers) to remove online material that infringes copyrights and increased cooperation in destroying
infringing goods and the equipment used to make them. The full text of the ACTA has not been released, despite requests by
EFF and Public Knowledge, as well as Canadian groups. Wikileaks is a site that posts anonymous submissions of sensitive documents.
"ACTA raises serious concerns for citizens' civil liberties and privacy rights," EFF international policy director Gwen Hinze
said in a statement. "This treaty could potentially change the way your computer is searched at the border or spark new invasive
monitoring from your ISP. People need to see the full text of ACTA now, so that they can evaluate its impact on their lives
and express that opinion to their political leaders. Instead, the USTR is keeping us in the dark while talks go on behind
closed doors."
A USTR spokesman didn't immediately respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the
District of Columbia.
In the lawsuit, Public Knowledge and EFF say the trade agreement's documents are subject to the U.S. Freedom of Information
Act (FOIA), which requires U.S. agencies to turn over most documents, with some exceptions, when a U.S. resident requests
them.
The two groups filed an FOIA request in June, then clarified the request two weeks later. USTR did not respond after that,
and in August, a lawyer for the two groups tried to reach a USTR official dealing with the FOIA request, but a voice message
was not returned.
ACTA is being negotiated as an executive agreement, not a treaty, meaning it wouldn't be subject to congressional scrutiny
and approval, said Art Brodsky, Public Knowledge's communications director.
"This is an unusual situation," he said. "At this point, we're trying to figure out what's going on. The other side is clearly
working with USTR. USTR will have public meetings and listen to us, but won't show us what's going on."
U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab announced plans last October to negotiate the trade agreement. USTR posted a notice
asking for public comments on ACTA in February, but the only documentation included in that request was a one-and-a-half page
fact sheet.
Nevertheless, several groups filed comments about ACTA. The Business Software Alliance, a trade group representing large software vendors, said it "strongly supports
USTR's efforts to address counterfeiting and piracy through a plurilateral trade agreement."
The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) filed comments offering suggestions for the trade agreement. Among its
recommendations: Countries should allow investigators to treat piracy like organized crime, giving IP enforcement efforts
additional resources used to fight organized crime. The RIAA also wants laws requiring ISPs to remove infringing materials
posted by subscribers, the trade group said in its comments.
The Motion Picture Association of America also filed comments supporting ACTA and offering suggestions.
Other countries involved in the ACTA talks are Switzerland, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico,
Jordan, Morocco and the United Arab Emirates.
The IDG News Service is a Network World affiliate.
Partner Content
www.bmc.com
Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling
Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.
Download whitepaper
Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation
Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.
Download whitepaper
Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video
A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member. See how in this 2-minute video overview.
Go to video
Comment