Forrester: Discontent persists over SAP maintenance hike
By Chris Kanaracus
,
IDG News Service
, 10/10/2008
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
A new Forrester Research study that polled more than 200 SAP customers found widespread discontent over the vendor's recent
decision to shift customers to a pricier Enterprise Support offering, and also provides tips on how customers can mitigate
the increased cost.
SAP announced in July that Enterprise Support would replace its basic and premium support options. Enterprise Support costs
22 percent of a customer's license fees, compared to 17 percent for basic support. The additional costs will be phased in
over the next few years, and new charges won't begin until Jan. 1.
But Forrester clients voiced a number of common gripes.
Eighty-five percent of the clients interviewed described minimal utilization of the Basic Support offering. "The average customer
claims to connect with SAP fewer than six times a year -- the equivalent of buying a comprehensive but expensive insurance
policy and rarely utilizing it," the report states.
Customers also complained to Forrester about the time it takes SAP to meet requests for new features.
"Customers believe that the maintenance dollars paid to SAP should go to filling in key functionality gaps in the software.
However, there are a plethora of examples where key functionality requested two to four years ago by multiple customers in
the same or different industries were not delivered in SAP R/3 4.7, let alone available in SAP ERP 6.0," the report states.
Clients "want to know how much of their support dollars really go back into reinvestment versus profit margins," it adds.
SAP has cited a number of reasons for its decision, such as greater complexity in customer environments, and argues that Enterprise
Support provides a higher level of benefits for customers -- points the Forrester report does not dispute.
To mitigate the increased cost of maintenance, customers should seek steeper discounts on licensing deals, according to Forrester.
Another tactic would be to create a long-term "SAP containment strategy," which could include taking a look at other vendors.
"Many SAP clients with whom we spoke have begun the process of evaluating Oracle Siebel, Salesforce.com and others for customer
relationship management as well as Siperian, Initiate Systems and IBM for master data management."
Customers also should consider third-party options for support. While one company, Rimini Street, has announced plans to provide
such support, it has not yet begun doing so, and even when it does will focus on only SAP's R/3 products.
The Forrester report's results stand in contrast to SAP's past contention that while customers may not like to pay more money,
they understand the value of the new service.
An SAP spokesman was given a copy of the report on Friday, but did not immediately provide comment on its findings.
The IDG News Service is a Network World affiliate.
Partner Content
www.bmc.com
Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling
Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.
Download whitepaper
Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation
Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.
Download whitepaper
Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video
A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member. See how in this 2-minute video overview.
Go to video
Comment