P2P legislation forcing university IT to get tough on piracy
Compliance with new P2P legislation proving costly for IT teams at the nation's colleges and universities
By
Ellen Messmer
,
Network World
, 10/23/2008
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
New legislation is putting pressure on U.S. colleges and universities to do a better job combating illegal file-sharing --
and it's taking a toll on campus IT departments, according to research published this week.
A law passed by Congress and signed into law by President Bush in August requires the nation's 4,400 public and private colleges
and universities to address the issue of illegal peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing of digital content on campus.
Buried in the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 are requirements that campuses inform students that illegal distribution
of copyrighted materials, such as music and movies, is subject to criminal and civil penalties. The law requires college and
university management to certify to the U.S. Secretary of Education that they have developed plans to "effectively combat"
illegal P2P.
The new law also strongly encourages the use of technical measures to monitor and block illegal P2P, which some observers
in academia expect the U.S. Department of Education will make a mandatory requirement during the next year.
Beyond trying to stop illegal P2P activity by students on campus networks, the new law suggests colleges and universities
ought to be licensing digital music services, such as those from Napster, for students.
"The legislation is explicit that campuses are expected to offer an alternative to P2P piracy by licensing a music service
such as Napster," says Kenneth Green, founding director of the Encino, Calif.-based Campus Computing Project (CCP), which
since 1990 has studied the role of information technology in American higher education. If this becomes a requirement next
year, campuses can expect to pay "six figures" for the kind of licensing envisioned under the legislation, a provision supported
by such trade groups as the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and the Recording Industry Association of America
(RIAA).
While Green doesn't deny that illegal P2P file-sharing occurs on college campuses across the country, he adds that MPAA and
RIAA (which successfully lobbied Congress to get the P2P file-sharing provisions into the 2008 bill) are overstating the problem.
This week the CCP published a survey of 321 colleges and universities to see how they're handling P2P piracy issues. The survey,
titled "The Campus Costs of P2P Compliance," also draws on data from CCP's annual, broader 2007 survey of IT on campus.
Survey respondents report the burden for P2P compliance is falling directly on campus IT personnel and is a huge drain on
their time. "As high as two IT personnel are involved, which could mean a salary overhead of $150,000 to 200,000," Green says.
The survey found that about 85% of academic institutions already inform their students about P2P piracy. Methods vary widely
-- from simple posters on the wall to more in-depth online tutorials required at some places, such as Cornell University,
to teach students rights and responsibilities before they use the college network, Green says.
Comments (4)
P2PBy burnme on October 27, 2008, 4:56 pmThis is the entertainment industrys attempt at buying off congress to try and stop file sharing. What this will result in is University fees going up to purchase...
Reply | Read entire comment
Faulty logicBy Anonymous on October 27, 2008, 5:33 pmCongress (and especially Bush) needs to go back to college to learn some basic thinking skills. Forcing universities to give away free music doesn't fix the stated...
Reply | Read entire comment
REALLY???By Anonymous on October 28, 2008, 1:03 pmI worked in Higher Ed IT for the better part of this decade. "As high as two IT personnel are involved, which could mean a salary overhead of $150,000 to 200,000,"...
Reply | Read entire comment
if you think of salaryBy Anon on November 8, 2008, 10:15 pmif you think of salary without overhead, your comments are probably pretty accurate, however, think of it this way. The university wants to state why they can't...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments