- Microsoft Windows chief decries standards grandstanding
- The 5 best, and 5 worst, features of Google Chrome OS
- Federal government using PS3 to crack pedophile passwords
- 10G Ethernet cheat sheet
- Top 10 free Windows tools for IT pros, at a glance
|
IT professionals have historically monitored network traffic patterns to better understand network usage, to expose security events, and to generally promote overall network health. Traffic analysis can likewise be applied to the Web to understand a wide range of behavior patterns ranging from social media networks to suggestion systems in e-commerce to even the current hot topic: the presidential race.
What we found in our analysis of both rudimentary (such as tracking campaign site visits and domain registration tallies) and more complex traffic-tracking mechanisms (such as search tallies and online trading trends) applied across all other Internet segments, is that online traffic patterns are leaning – not unlike traditional polling data -- in the direction of Sen. Barack Obama. (See a slideshow explaining eight ways technology has shaped the elections.)
To assess the validity of how traffic-analysis techniques could provide any insight into the election, we first examined the most basic measurements available: campaign site visits and domain registration and moved to more content-focused metrics such as blog mentions and social network links.
All the data discussed in this article is provided by live URLs so readers can view the content themselves to tie into the most up-to-date information. Our intent is not to judge either the McCain or Obama campaigns or the candidates themselves, but rather to examine how the election is shaping up online and delve into whether the data provides any insight into the eventual outcome.
The usage of the two campaign Web sites (www.johnmccain.com and www.barackobama.com) can be tracked like any other large Web site via services like Hitwise, Alexa, Compete and Google Trends, to name a few. Overall, traffic to the campaign Web sites shows very clear trends regardless of data source.
Hitwise shows a consistent 2-to-1 advantage in unique site visitors for Obama's official campaign site in a head-to-head comparison, from August through early October -- with the exception of a significant narrowing of that gap around the week of the Republican National Convention.
Comparing the two campaign sites against other popular sites on the Internet tells a similar story. Compete.com ranked both campaign sites in the top 500 Web sites in the United States for September — with the Obama site significantly more popular at No. 186 than the McCain site at No. 384, even though the latter has made up tremendous ground over the past year.
Similarly, numbers from Compete show the Obama campaign site serving about 64% of the total unique visitors to both campaign sites for the year ending in September. The graph shows that the Obama site has managed to sustain a large early lead built up during the protracted Democratic nomination contest, despite rapid growth by the McCain site as the general election campaign itself intensified over the summer.
Quantcast had rankings similair to Compete's, with the Obama site sitting at #115 with around 7.9 million visitors, compared with the McCain site at No. 272 with around 4.3 million users (this matches with Compete's traffic split as well) . These Quantcast traffic trends also showed a "pinch" at the time of the Republican convention in an otherwise wide and relatively persistent gap. One additional point of interest in the Quantcast data is a noticeable widening of Obama's normal (pre-convention) advantage, starting sometime around the middle of September. Quantcast, at least, appears to show Obama pulling away.
Comments (22)
Can the Web predict the next president?By Anonymous on October 27, 2008, 12:53 pmInteresting idea but it makes the assumption that Democrats and Republicans are equally likely to use the web to the same degree? Is this really likely? What about...
Reply | Read entire comment
Perhaps frequency of siteBy Anon on October 27, 2008, 1:12 pmPerhaps frequency of site access does not imply support of a particular candidate but rather an attempt to investigate. For example, John McCain is fairly straightforward...
Reply | Read entire comment
Not yet enough data.By unclesmrgol on October 27, 2008, 1:45 pmEven though I'm a McCain supporter, I've visited the Obama site far more often. Maybe that says something -- or maybe not. The comment by another poster about...
Reply | Read entire comment
but it makes the assumptionBy Joe Lima on October 27, 2008, 2:35 pmbut it makes the assumption that Democrats and Republicans are equally likely to use the web Actually this is not an assumption that we make. In fact, we included...
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: Perhaps frequency of siteBy Thomas and Joe Respond on October 27, 2008, 3:03 pmThat is entirely plausible. And in the case of search term frequency it's even more likely that part of what you are seeing is the effect of people simply trying...
Reply | Read entire comment
Web predicts who wastes more company' timeBy Anonymous on October 27, 2008, 3:06 pmUsers are abusing their company resources during the work day. Evidence of this is everywhere. See any Obama video on Youtube and you'll see thousands of comments...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments