- Is the Cisco MARS mission going to abort?
- First iPhone worm spreads Rick Astley wallpaper
- 10 stunning 3D buildings made with Google SketchUp
- Open source software ready for big business
- Four reasons to buy (and one reason to avoid) the Droid
Saying Intel will invest its way through the current economic crisis, President and CEO Paul Otellini put the company's money where his mouth is Tuesday, announcing US$170 million to be spent on new projects in China.
"Gordon Moore is the one who said 'you can't save your way out of a downturn.' Craig [Barrett] believed that, Gordon believed it and I believe it. Our investments next year remain intact," Otellini said at a press event in Beijing.
Intel said it was investing $150 million in 67 projects around China, some in conjunction with other companies including Lenovo, Haier, Neusoft and Tsinghua University. It did not elaborate on the nature of those programs, except to say they would "support the advancement of China's IT ecosystem and home-grown innovation."
Intel Capital also announced an additional $20 million investment in three companies working on clean technology projects, two of which, NP Holdings and Shenzhen-based Trony Solar, develop energy storage and solar film, respectively. The third investment went to ViewHigh Technologies, which develops software and services for the health-care industry. Intel Capital did not indicate the investment split among the three companies.
The company's most significant investment won't necessarily be with cash, but with new technology. "The biggest investment is that we will deploy 32-nanometer technology next year into production, well ahead of the rest of the industry," he said, but did not give a date for the deployment.
Otellini had spent the early part of Tuesday in the northeast Chinese city of Dalian, where the company is building Fab 68, a $2.5 billion, 300-mm wafer-fabrication plant, announced in March 2007. He said the facility's construction was on track, and would open in 2010.
He also addressed the shortfall in the production of Intel's netbook processor, Atom. "I would expect our supply will catch up with demand by the end of the year," Otellini said. "We had a very aggressive plan to ramp Atom volume over the course of 2008. To everyone's surprise, the demand was much better than they forecasted, and so we've been ramping production to meet the unforecasted demand since then."
As to the financial crisis' potential impact on Intel, Otellini said, "I did not foresee the economic downturn, but the fact that we did restructure ahead of that put us in a very good position to be able to weather this storm and not change our investment profile." Intel cut more than 10,000 jobs during 2006 and 2007, in a move designed to save the company between $2 billion to $3 billion annually.
Partner Content
www.bmc.com
Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling
Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.
Download whitepaper
Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation
Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.
Download whitepaper
Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video
A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member. See how in this 2-minute video overview.
Go to video
Comments (6)
US job lossesBy GoodByeUSJobs on October 28, 2008, 6:54 pmSo they cut 10,000 US jobs, saving 2-3 billion, and then spent at least 2.5 billion for a new fab in Dalian China? Anyone else see anything wrong with this?
Reply | Read entire comment
yes.By Anonymous on October 28, 2008, 8:46 pmgot problems ? Well, leave Iraq and you can save more money.
Reply | Read entire comment
They didnt cut job in US but in Asia...By Anonymous on October 28, 2008, 9:10 pmThey didnt cut job in US but in Asia.... Many of the function were transfer back to US during 2006 and 2007 SET.
Reply | Read entire comment
US jobsBy Anonymous on October 29, 2008, 3:45 amThere's nothing wrong with this. We live in the 21st Century, the world is flat...
Reply | Read entire comment
It was worldwide cutsBy Anonymous on October 29, 2008, 3:51 amThe jobs that were lost were across the world, mainly management and non manufacturing. This means a leaner flatter structured organisation with less red tape to...
Reply | Read entire comment
US job lossesBy Anonymous on October 29, 2008, 2:40 pmI may have been a little shortsighted with my assumption than the jobs were US jobs; however, I think my overall point is still valid. Is it in our best interest...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments