- How to make new stuff from your piles of obsolete tech
- Why your computer sucks
- 10 recession-proof IT skills
- Juniper execs share network vision
- 9-year-old plots his fifth Microsoft certification
Microsoft's latest security report shows that the number of new vulnerabilities found in its software was lower in first half of the year than the last half of 2007, with the Windows Vista OS proving more resistant to exploits than XP.
Microsoft reported 77 vulnerabilities from January to June compared to 116 for the last six months of 2007, according to the company's fifth Security Intelligence Report.
The decline is in line with the software industry as a whole, which saw a 19% decrease in vulnerability disclosures compared to the first half of 2007, Microsoft said. However, those vulnerabilities considered highly severe rose 13%.
Exploit code was available for about a third of the 77 vulnerabilities; however, reliable exploit code is available for only eight of those 77.
Other data shows that XP is attacked more frequently than Vista. In XP machines, Microsoft's own software contained 42 percent of the vulnerabilities attacked, while 58 percent were in third party software. For Vista machines, Microsoft's software had 6% of the vulnerabilities attacked, with third-party software containing 94% of the flaws.
New security technologies such as address space randomization have led to fewer successful attacks against Vista, said Vinny Gullotto, general manager of Microsoft's malware protection center.
"Moving onto Vista is clearly a safe bet," Gullotto said. "For us, it's a clear indicator that attacking Vista or trying to exploit Vista specifically is becoming much more difficult."
The highest number of exploits were released for Windows 2000 and Windows Server 2003 operating systems, Microsoft said.
(See a slideshow on nine Web sites for Windows administrators.)
Hackers appear to be increasingly targeting Internet surfers who speak Chinese. Microsoft found that 47% of browser-based exploits were executed against systems with Chinese set as the system language.
The most popular browser-based exploit is for the MDAC (Microsoft Data Access Components) bug that was patched (MS06-014) by Microsoft in April 2006.Some 12.1 percent of all exploits encountered on the Internet targeted that flaw. The second most encountered exploit is one aimed at a vulnerability in the RealPlayer multimedia software, CVE-2007-5601.
The two most commonly exploited vulnerabilities in Windows Vista concerned ActiveX controls that are commonly installed in China, Microsoft said.
Gullotto said Microsoft is continuing to improve the Malicious Software Removal Tool (MSRT), a free but very basic security application that can remove some of the most common malware families.
Last month, Microsoft added detection for "Antivirus XP," one of several questionable programs that warn users their PC is infected with malware, Gullotto said. The program badgers users to buy the software, which is of questionable utility. "Antivirus XP" is also very difficult to remove.
Microsoft fielded some 1,000 calls a month about Antivirus XP on its PC Safety line, where users can call and ask security questions. Since the MSRT started automatically removing the program, calls concerning Antivirus XP dropped by half the first week, Gullotto said.
Comments (15)
No "Statistics are lying" comments?By Anonymous on November 3, 2008, 10:24 amNo "Statistics are lying" or "how much did M$ pay for this article to be written?" comments? I'm stunned, maybe because the Mac/Linux fan boys run away at the idea...
Reply | Read entire comment
No "Your market share is so small" or "When you are more than 11By Anonymous on November 3, 2008, 11:04 am"No "Statistics are lying" or "how much did M$ pay for this article to be written?" comments?" Nope. Vista isn't as widely deployed as XP. Or haven't you forgotten...
Reply | Read entire comment
Hackers target XP since Vista has such a small install baseBy Anonymous on November 3, 2008, 1:44 pmThe reason [fewer] attacks are being written for Vista is because of its relatively small install base. If a hacker attacks XP, they can hit 80% of the machines,...
Reply | Read entire comment
microsoft didn't pay anyone for this!!!By Anonymous on November 3, 2008, 1:48 pmthey just put out their own findings and gave it to people to misinterpret
Reply | Read entire comment
Vista is more secure, it doesn't make the problems go away with By Anonymous on November 3, 2008, 1:57 pmVista is more secure, it doesn't make the problems go away with it though. I've been running Vista since march of last year and still f*&^%ing want to toss it out...
Reply | Read entire comment
It actually is more secure...By inverse137 on November 3, 2008, 2:05 pmThe quotes so far are "misinterpretted statistics," "Microsoft's own findings," "Market share too small." The reality is, Vista is more secure but it is too buggy...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments