- How to make new stuff from your piles of obsolete tech
- Why your computer sucks
- 10 recession-proof IT skills
- Juniper execs share network vision
- 9-year-old plots his fifth Microsoft certification
No, we're not joking. The Camera Phone Predator Alert Act (H.R. 414) is the real deal. Fresh off the legislative desk of New York Representative Peter King (R), the bill--currently cosponsored by goose egg--would require an audible tone to accompany all cellular phones with an installed camera that are created in the U.S. This tone, likely a clicking noise of some sort, would sound, "within a reasonable radius of the phone whenever a photograph is taken with the camera in such phone." And don't think that evildoers would be able to conceal their predatory ways by flicking an iPhone-style audio toggle switch. Any mobile phones built after the bill becomes a law would be prohibited from including any way to eliminate or reduce the volume of said noise.
And the reasoning for this legislation? But a single sentence: "Congress finds that children and adolescents have been exploited by photographs taken in dressing rooms and public places with the use of a camera phone."
While this bill might very well age into irrelevance within the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, it's not as far-fetched as it might sound. Camera phones in Japan already have features like this enabled by law: A rude awakening to new phone owners that would like a way to turn off--or turn down--shutter noises that have had their volumes jacked up for this reason specifically.
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications."' Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (9)
DEAF people can NOT hear CLICKBy Anonymous on January 27, 2009, 7:42 amIf they passed Law for Click then they must added Flash for Deaf people. It will create ugly LAW
Reply | Read entire comment
ClicksBy Anonymous on January 27, 2009, 8:59 amOne would think the government has more pressing things to worry about that camera clicks. Where is the balance? what about nature photographers and hunters who...
Reply | Read entire comment
Upskirts, no; evidence of abuse or illegality, yesBy Anonymous on January 27, 2009, 7:12 pmI can understand wanting this to alert upskirting victims they are on 'candid camera', but what about the bystander who takes a picture of some illegality or abuse...
Reply | Read entire comment
This is a waste of taxpayer time and moneyBy Anonymous on January 27, 2009, 9:11 pmI mean, really. Come on. With the current economic disaster is this REALLY where our government should be investing their time and energy? Really? -Mike D http://www.daileymuse.com
Reply | Read entire comment
Makes sense to meBy Anonymous on January 28, 2009, 3:01 amMy YMCA had to ban the use of cell phones and cameras in the locker rooms. Seems that some idiots were taking pictures of each other in the locker room, but bystanders...
Reply | Read entire comment
Click is okayBy Anon on January 28, 2009, 6:12 amI am a professional photographer, and we use silent cameras. Even if the cameras make noises, we are not bothered by this law. I am assuming that you are not a professional,...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments