Conficker worm gets an evil twin
By
Robert McMillan
,
IDG News Service
, 02/20/2009
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
The criminals behind the widespread Conficker worm have released a new version of the malware that could signal a major shift in the way the worm operates.
Slideshow: 10 of the Worst Moments in Network Security History
The new variant, dubbed Conficker B++, was spotted three days ago by SRI International researchers, who published details of the new code on Thursday. To the untrained eye, the new variant looks almost identical to the previous version of the worm, Conficker B. But the B++ variant uses new techniques to download software, giving its creators more flexibility
in what they can do with infected machines.
Conficker-infected machines could be used for nasty stuff -- sending spam, logging keystrokes, or launching denial of service
(DoS) attacks, but an ad hoc group calling itself the Conficker Cabal has largely prevented this from happening. They've kept Conficker under control by cracking the algorithm the software uses to find one of thousands of rendezvous
points on the Internet where it can look for new code. These rendezvous points use unique domain names, such as pwulrrog.org,
that the Conficker Cabal has worked hard to register and keep out of the hands of the criminals.
The new B++ variant uses the same algorithm to look for rendezvous points, but it also gives the creators two new techniques
that skip them altogether. That means that the Cabal's most successful technique could be bypassed.
Conficker underwent a major rewrite in December, when the B variant was released. But this latest B++ version includes more
subtle changes, according to Phil Porras, a program director with SRI. "This is a more surgical set of changes that they've
made," he said.
To put things in perspective: There were 297 subroutines in Conficker B; 39 new routines were added in B++ and three existing
subroutines were modified, SRI wrote in a report on the new variant. B++ suggests "the malware authors may be seeking new
ways to obviate the need for Internet rendezvous points altogether," the report states.
Porras could not say how long Conficker B++ has been in circulation, but it first appeared on Feb. 6, according to a researcher
using the pseudonym Jart Armin, who works on the Hostexploit.com Web site, which has tracked Conficker.
Though he does not know whether B++ was created in response to the Cabal's work, "it does make the botnet more robust and
it does mitigate some of the Cabal's work," Support Intelligence CEO Rick Wesson said in an e-mail interview.
Also known as Downadup, Conficker spreads using a variety of techniques. It exploits a dangerous Windows bug to attack computers on a LAN, and it can also spread via USB devices such as cameras or storage devices. All variants of
Conficker have now infected about 10.5 million computers, according to SRI.
The IDG News Service is a Network World affiliate.
Comments (8)
Right....By Thronka on February 20, 2009, 4:35 pmI believe this worm is from the work of the Cobal itself - seeing is how long ago it was created and how soon the variant came out. Seems like a sham to me.
Reply | Read entire comment
popups etc...By Anonymous on February 21, 2009, 2:25 pmI immediately block any site that has any type of intercept ad, pop-up, or message, that even takes a second away from my time to read the article or item I have...
Reply | Read entire comment
Haven't you heard of aBy Anon on February 23, 2009, 10:15 amHaven't you heard of a browser called Firefox? Get enlightened. Get Firefox, dress it up with all the security gizmos and leave it to handle your pop ups, pop unders...
Reply | Read entire comment
Right...By Anonymous on February 23, 2009, 10:23 amAnd the Holocaust, the Moon landing and the Viet Nam war were all shams as well.
Reply | Read entire comment
two commentsBy Anon on February 23, 2009, 10:42 am1 - The people that build and maintain the sites you block under the above conditions have no idea that is what you are doing. I hope it makes you feel really good,...
Reply | Read entire comment
Great job on reporting such a successful wormBy traef06 on February 23, 2009, 11:13 amI enjoy the work you guys do. Your reporting always provides links for further research. Keep up the great work!
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments