- Microsoft Windows chief decries standards grandstanding
- The 5 best, and 5 worst, features of Google Chrome OS
- Federal government using PS3 to crack pedophile passwords
- 10G Ethernet cheat sheet
- Top 10 free Windows tools for IT pros, at a glance
It's not a blade server – it's an architecture.
View a slideshow of this product.
Cisco stressed the holistic approach of its Unified Computing System during its widely watched launch Monday, claiming its innovations in tying together servers, storage, networking and virtualization make it unique in the industry. Observers trying to pit IT directly against HP and IBM data center blade servers were missing the point, Cisco officials suggested.
"We focus not on competition, but where the market is going," Cisco CEO John Chambers said during the system's launch. "This is the future of the data center. It will evolve into clouds and change business models forever."
Cisco Unified Computing System is designed to allow customers to build next-generation data centers that are optimized for virtualized resources – servers, storage, applications, and networking. It is intended to manage data center operations as a unified environment and supports applications and services from leading vendors, including Microsoft, EMC, VMware, Red Hat and Novell.
Cisco came up with the Unified Computing concept three years ago and launched product development shortly thereafter, Chambers said.
Cisco says UCS can reduce IT infrastructure costs and complexity, help extend capital assets and improve business operations. UCS features a "wire once" unified data center fabric for single access to SANs, network attached storage, and iSCSI platforms.
UCS provides up to a 20% reduction in capital expenditures and up to a 30% reduction in operational expenditures, Cisco claims. It can provision applications in minutes instead of days, can be managed as a single system supporting more than 300 servers and thousands of virtual machines, and improves energy efficiency by reducing the number of servers, switches, adapters and cables by up to 50%, which translates into lower power and cooling requirements.
The system is also intended to provide investment protection through "industry standards," Cisco says. At the same time, however, Cisco stressed its uniqueness in that each element – server, storage, networking and virtualization – is optimized for operation within the UCS system through patented techniques for memory expansion, management, and fabric connection.
Blade servers from other vendors – like HP and IBM – and other individual elements may not be able to fully utilize these advances, Cisco officials suggested during the UCS launch.(Compare Server products.) Much has been made of how Cisco's move into this market would pit it against former partners.
"We're selling this as a system," said Rob Lloyd, senior vice president of Cisco Worldwide Operations. "It will be shipped and configured as a system. The innovations are all tied together. This is not a new blade server; it is a new architecture."
Adds Cisco marketing vice-president David Lawler, "Other vendors' solutions will not work because (UCS is) a single unified system. And we're not developing blades for other [vendors'] platforms."
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications."' Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (9)
Service providers?By Girish on March 16, 2009, 3:03 pmIs Savvis the only provider? Any idea where the 10 beta sites are? Girish
Reply | Read entire comment
Love the spin...! Will HP and IBM buy it...By Anonymous on March 16, 2009, 4:50 pmAs the story goes... with a little bit of tongue in cheek (but its gets the discussion going...) "It's not a blade server – it's an architecture." That's the spin...
Reply | Read entire comment
It's more than spin...it'sBy Anon on March 16, 2009, 6:13 pmIt's more than spin...it's actually true. Traditional blade servers can be attached to traditional SAN and Ethernet networks at the host level. Not so with this...
Reply | Read entire comment
.....if its not a blade server then....what is it....?By Anonymous on March 16, 2009, 9:17 pm...so the spin is that its NOT a traditional blade server,.... its a PROPRIETARY blade server.... - ah that's the difference...now I understand (sorry - couldn't...
Reply | Read entire comment
VM governance is neededBy paul2007lopez on March 16, 2009, 9:58 pmThe operational maturity model for Virtualization as a practice is rather mixed. There are still many issues regarding VM sprawl, orphaned VMs, decommissioning processes...
Reply | Read entire comment
It's once again! "Crisco" taking a core technology and wrapping By Anonymous on March 17, 2009, 9:16 amIt's once again! "Crisco" taking a core technology and wrapping it into a supposedly "intelligent" network appliance. And yes it is another marketing spin and they...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments